عنوان

نقش تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در رفتارهای پرخطر رانندگی

کد کشور

IR

شماره

۲۷۴۴پ

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن

فارسی

کشور محل نشر

IR

عنوان اصلي

نقش تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در رفتارهای پرخطر رانندگی

نام عام مواد

[پایان‌نامه]

عنوان اصلي به زبان ديگر

The> road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers >

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره

علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation scienecs))

تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره

، ۱۳۹۷

نام خاص و کميت اثر

۱۴۱ص.

متن يادداشت

پیوست

متن يادداشت

چاپی

جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن

کارشناسی ارشد

نظم درجات

روانشناسی بالینی Clinical Psychology))

زمان اعطا مدرک

۱۳۹۷/۰۷/۱۷

کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده

علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation scienecs))

متن يادداشت

مقدمه :تصادفات جاده ای، یکی از مهمترین عوامل مرگ و میر در کشورمان می باشد .عوامل متعددی در حوادث جاده ای شناسایی شده که از این میان عوامل انسانی در بروز این حوادث نقش بسزایی داشته است .از میان عوامل انسانی که می تواند شامل موارد متعددی باشد در این پژوهش به عوامل روان شناختی موثر پرداخته شده است .هدف از این تحقیق شناسایی و مقایسه تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در دو گروه رانندگان ایمن و پرخطر بود .روش :در این پژوهش ۶۰ راننده پرخطر که به تشخیص کارشناس پلیس راهور ماشین یا گواهی نامه آنها به خاطر انجام رفتار پرخطر رانندگی توقیف شده بود به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس وارد پژوهش شد.گروه رانندگان ایمن از نظر سن، تحصیلات با گروه رانندگان پرخطر همتا شدند و شامل ۶۰ راننده که در سوابق آنها هیچ گونه تخلف یا رفتارپرخطر ثبت نشده بود می شد .در ابتدا در هر دو گروه آزمودنی ها تست کامپیوتری دات پروب را انجام دادند و سپس پرسش نامه تکانشگری بارات، پرسش نامه رفتار رانندگی منچستر و پرسش نامه سبک های تصمیم گیری اسکات و بروس را انجام دادند .یافته ها :نتایج در متغیر تکانشگری نشان داد که دو گروه از نظر تکانشگری حرکتی، تکانشگری شناختی و بی برنامگی تفاوت معناداری با یکدیگر دارند بطوریکه گروه رانندگان پرخطر در هر سه خرده مقیاس تکانشگری نمرات بالاتری را کسب کردند .در متغیر سوگیری توجه تفاوت معناداری بین دو گروه دیده نشد و هم چنین گروه رانندگان پرخطر در سبک های تصمیم گیری اجتنابی و فوری نمرات بالاتری نسبت به گروه رانندگان ایمن کسب کردند .نتیجه گیری :نتایج تحقیق نشان دهنده تفاوت بین تکانشگری و سبک های تصمیم گیری می باشد که این یافته ها اهمیت ارزیابی های روان شناختی را هنگام اخذ گواهی نامه نشان می دهد .کلمات کلیدی :تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه، سبک های تصمیم گیری، رانندگی پرخطر

متن يادداشت

Background: The road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers

خط فهرستنویسی و خط اصلی شناسه

ba

عنوان اصلي به زبان ديگر

The> road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers >

موضوع مستند نشده

impulsivity

موضوع مستند نشده

attention bias

متن عنصر شناسه ای مقوله موضوعی

تکانشگری

متن عنصر شناسه ای مقوله موضوعی

سوگیری توجه

متن عنصر شناسه ای مقوله موضوعی

سبک های تصمیم گیری

متن عنصر شناسه ای مقوله موضوعی

impulsivity

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

براتی بلداجی، فاطمه

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Barati Boldaje, Fatemeh

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

نصرت آبادی، مسعود

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

پورشهباز، عباس

کشور

ایران

سازمان

دانشگاه علوم توان بخشی و سلامت اجتماعی

نام ميزبان

2744t.pdf

شماره دسترسي

محرمانه

اطلاعات مختصر

محرمانه

تاريخ و ساعت مذاکره و دسترسي

2744t.pdf

بيت در ثانيه

1436382

ارتباط براي تسهيلات دسترسي

مرجع

نوع فرمت الکترونيکي

متن

اندازه فايل

0

شماره کنترل رکورد

۴۴۷۲پ

شماره فيلد فرمت مبدا

محل نگهداری: دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی

وضعیت فهرست نویسی

نمایه‌سازی قبلی

فرمت انتشار

چاپی-الکترونیکی

نوع ماده

TF

پیشوند ISBD اعمال شده است

1

سطح دسترسي

a

تكميل شده

Y