عنوان

نقش تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در رفتارهای پرخطر رانندگی

IR

۲۷۴۴پ

فارسی

IR

نقش تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در رفتارهای پرخطر رانندگی

[پایان‌نامه]

The> road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers >

علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation scienecs))

، ۱۳۹۷

۱۴۱ص.

پیوست

چاپی

کارشناسی ارشد

روانشناسی بالینی Clinical Psychology))

۱۳۹۷/۰۷/۱۷

علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation scienecs))

مقدمه :تصادفات جاده ای، یکی از مهمترین عوامل مرگ و میر در کشورمان می باشد .عوامل متعددی در حوادث جاده ای شناسایی شده که از این میان عوامل انسانی در بروز این حوادث نقش بسزایی داشته است .از میان عوامل انسانی که می تواند شامل موارد متعددی باشد در این پژوهش به عوامل روان شناختی موثر پرداخته شده است .هدف از این تحقیق شناسایی و مقایسه تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در دو گروه رانندگان ایمن و پرخطر بود .روش :در این پژوهش ۶۰ راننده پرخطر که به تشخیص کارشناس پلیس راهور ماشین یا گواهی نامه آنها به خاطر انجام رفتار پرخطر رانندگی توقیف شده بود به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس وارد پژوهش شد.گروه رانندگان ایمن از نظر سن، تحصیلات با گروه رانندگان پرخطر همتا شدند و شامل ۶۰ راننده که در سوابق آنها هیچ گونه تخلف یا رفتارپرخطر ثبت نشده بود می شد .در ابتدا در هر دو گروه آزمودنی ها تست کامپیوتری دات پروب را انجام دادند و سپس پرسش نامه تکانشگری بارات، پرسش نامه رفتار رانندگی منچستر و پرسش نامه سبک های تصمیم گیری اسکات و بروس را انجام دادند .یافته ها :نتایج در متغیر تکانشگری نشان داد که دو گروه از نظر تکانشگری حرکتی، تکانشگری شناختی و بی برنامگی تفاوت معناداری با یکدیگر دارند بطوریکه گروه رانندگان پرخطر در هر سه خرده مقیاس تکانشگری نمرات بالاتری را کسب کردند .در متغیر سوگیری توجه تفاوت معناداری بین دو گروه دیده نشد و هم چنین گروه رانندگان پرخطر در سبک های تصمیم گیری اجتنابی و فوری نمرات بالاتری نسبت به گروه رانندگان ایمن کسب کردند .نتیجه گیری :نتایج تحقیق نشان دهنده تفاوت بین تکانشگری و سبک های تصمیم گیری می باشد که این یافته ها اهمیت ارزیابی های روان شناختی را هنگام اخذ گواهی نامه نشان می دهد .کلمات کلیدی :تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه، سبک های تصمیم گیری، رانندگی پرخطر

Background: The road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers

ba

The> road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers >

impulsivity

attention bias

تکانشگری

سوگیری توجه

سبک های تصمیم گیری

impulsivity

براتی بلداجی، فاطمه

Barati Boldaje, Fatemeh

نصرت آبادی، مسعود

پورشهباز، عباس

ایران

دانشگاه علوم توان بخشی و سلامت اجتماعی

2744t.pdf

محرمانه

محرمانه

2744t.pdf

1436382

مرجع

متن

0

۴۴۷۲پ

محل نگهداری: دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی

نمایه‌سازی قبلی

چاپی-الکترونیکی

TF

1

a

Y