عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY NUMBER
Country Code
IR
Number
۲۷۴۴پ
LANGUAGE OF THE ITEM
.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc
فارسی
COUNTRY OF PUBLICATION OR PRODUCTlON
Country of publication
IR
TITLE AND STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY
Title Proper
نقش تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در رفتارهای پرخطر رانندگی
General Material Designation
[پایان‌نامه]
Parallel Title Proper
The> road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers >
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation scienecs))
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
، ۱۳۹۷
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
۱۴۱ص.
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
پیوست
NOTES PERTAINING TO PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC.
Text of Note
چاپی
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
کارشناسی ارشد
Discipline of degree
روانشناسی بالینی Clinical Psychology))
Date of degree
۱۳۹۷/۰۷/۱۷
Body granting the degree
علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation scienecs))
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
مقدمه :تصادفات جاده ای، یکی از مهمترین عوامل مرگ و میر در کشورمان می باشد .عوامل متعددی در حوادث جاده ای شناسایی شده که از این میان عوامل انسانی در بروز این حوادث نقش بسزایی داشته است .از میان عوامل انسانی که می تواند شامل موارد متعددی باشد در این پژوهش به عوامل روان شناختی موثر پرداخته شده است .هدف از این تحقیق شناسایی و مقایسه تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه و سبک های تصمیم گیری در دو گروه رانندگان ایمن و پرخطر بود .روش :در این پژوهش ۶۰ راننده پرخطر که به تشخیص کارشناس پلیس راهور ماشین یا گواهی نامه آنها به خاطر انجام رفتار پرخطر رانندگی توقیف شده بود به روش نمونه گیری در دسترس وارد پژوهش شد.گروه رانندگان ایمن از نظر سن، تحصیلات با گروه رانندگان پرخطر همتا شدند و شامل ۶۰ راننده که در سوابق آنها هیچ گونه تخلف یا رفتارپرخطر ثبت نشده بود می شد .در ابتدا در هر دو گروه آزمودنی ها تست کامپیوتری دات پروب را انجام دادند و سپس پرسش نامه تکانشگری بارات، پرسش نامه رفتار رانندگی منچستر و پرسش نامه سبک های تصمیم گیری اسکات و بروس را انجام دادند .یافته ها :نتایج در متغیر تکانشگری نشان داد که دو گروه از نظر تکانشگری حرکتی، تکانشگری شناختی و بی برنامگی تفاوت معناداری با یکدیگر دارند بطوریکه گروه رانندگان پرخطر در هر سه خرده مقیاس تکانشگری نمرات بالاتری را کسب کردند .در متغیر سوگیری توجه تفاوت معناداری بین دو گروه دیده نشد و هم چنین گروه رانندگان پرخطر در سبک های تصمیم گیری اجتنابی و فوری نمرات بالاتری نسبت به گروه رانندگان ایمن کسب کردند .نتیجه گیری :نتایج تحقیق نشان دهنده تفاوت بین تکانشگری و سبک های تصمیم گیری می باشد که این یافته ها اهمیت ارزیابی های روان شناختی را هنگام اخذ گواهی نامه نشان می دهد .کلمات کلیدی :تکانشگری، سوگیری توجه، سبک های تصمیم گیری، رانندگی پرخطر
Text of Note
Background: The road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers
ba
PARALLEL TITLE PROPER
Parallel Title
The> road accidents (RAs) is considered one of the most important leading causes of death in Iran. Different factors are associated with road accidents, but human factors particularly psychological factors would play the predominant role in the incidence of road accidents crashes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigation and compare impulsivity, attention bias and decision-making styles among two groups of drivers including safer drivers and high-risk drivers. Materials and methods:A causal-comparative design was used for this survey. One hundred-twenty drivers (60 high-risk drivers and 60 safe drivers) were participated in this study. High-risk drivers were selected based on detection of driving violation as viewed by police officer and history of high-risk behaviors. Convenience sampling technique was used for this survey. Safer drivers were individually matched for age, education and sex with high-risk drivers. Moreover, safer drivers have not committed neither driving violation nor high-risk behaviors. Dot-Prop Computer Test, Manchester Driving Behavior Questionnaire (MDBQ), Scott and Bruce's General Decision- Making Style Inventory (GDMS) were conducted among two groups (safer drivers and high-risk drivers). Data analysis was performed using the stoical package for social science(SPSS) V 21. Results: The results of this study has indicated that there was a statistically significant relationship among motor impulsivity, cognitive impulsivity and lack of planning in two groups. High-risk drivers achieved the highest score in three subscales of the impulsivity. There was not any significant relationship from aspect of attention bias among two groups. Furthermore, high-risk drivers obtained the highest score in decision-making styles (avoidance and immediate) in comparison with safer drivers. Conclusion: There was significant differences between impulsivity and decision-making. These results have shown the importance of conducting psychological assessments while getting a driving license. Keywords: impulsivity, attention bias, decision-making styles, high-risk drivers >
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
impulsivity
attention bias
(SUBJECT CATEGORY (Provisional
Subject Category Entry Element Text
تکانشگری
Subject Category Entry Element Text
سوگیری توجه
Subject Category Entry Element Text
سبک های تصمیم گیری
Subject Category Entry Element Text
impulsivity
PERSONAL NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY
براتی بلداجی، فاطمه
Barati Boldaje, Fatemeh
PERSONAL NAME - SECONDARY RESPONSIBILITY
نصرت آبادی، مسعود
پورشهباز، عباس
ORIGINATING SOURCE
Country
ایران
Agency
دانشگاه علوم توان بخشی و سلامت اجتماعی
ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Host name
2744t.pdf
Access number
محرمانه
Compression information
محرمانه
Date and Hour of Consultation and Access
2744t.pdf
Bits per second
1436382
Contact for access assistance
مرجع
Electronic Format Type
متن
File size
0
Record control number
۴۴۷۲پ
DATA NOT CONVERTED FROM SOURCE FORMAT
Tag of the Source Format Field
محل نگهداری: دانشگاه علوم بهزیستی و توانبخشی
نمایه‌سازی قبلی
چاپی-الکترونیکی
TF
1
a
Y
