عنوان

Person and Context

شماره

LA116943

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن

انگلیسی

عنوان اصلي

Person and Context

نام عام مواد

[Article]

نام نخستين پديدآور

Jaeseung Cha

محل نشرو پخش و غیره

Leiden

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره

Brill

متن يادداشت

The way in which theology is formulated often relates to three components-texts, traditions, and contexts-each of which has its own distinctive and interactive forces to shape theology. The major conundrum affecting methodology of contemporary theology is, however, a radical shift from text and tradition to context, as if both text and tradition had been contextual and thus theology were always to be contextual. What if our contexts are oppressive and violent? On what basis can we resist such violent contextual values? Who are 'we' here and what does 'resist' imply for theological method? Reviewing various concepts of person in Max Scheler, Korean neo-Confucian scholar Dasan Cheong Yak Yong (1762-1836), and Emmanuel Levinas, this article argues that person, not as a self-sufficient subjectivity but as one interacting with others and their contexts, must be included as one of the subjects that formulates theology, along with texts, traditions, and contexts, and that interactions among the four components are the actual forces for constructing theology. The way in which theology is formulated often relates to three components-texts, traditions, and contexts-each of which has its own distinctive and interactive forces to shape theology. The major conundrum affecting methodology of contemporary theology is, however, a radical shift from text and tradition to context, as if both text and tradition had been contextual and thus theology were always to be contextual. What if our contexts are oppressive and violent? On what basis can we resist such violent contextual values? Who are 'we' here and what does 'resist' imply for theological method? Reviewing various concepts of person in Max Scheler, Korean neo-Confucian scholar Dasan Cheong Yak Yong (1762-1836), and Emmanuel Levinas, this article argues that person, not as a self-sufficient subjectivity but as one interacting with others and their contexts, must be included as one of the subjects that formulates theology, along with texts, traditions, and contexts, and that interactions among the four components are the actual forces for constructing theology. The way in which theology is formulated often relates to three components-texts, traditions, and contexts-each of which has its own distinctive and interactive forces to shape theology. The major conundrum affecting methodology of contemporary theology is, however, a radical shift from text and tradition to context, as if both text and tradition had been contextual and thus theology were always to be contextual. What if our contexts are oppressive and violent? On what basis can we resist such violent contextual values? Who are 'we' here and what does 'resist' imply for theological method? Reviewing various concepts of person in Max Scheler, Korean neo-Confucian scholar Dasan Cheong Yak Yong (1762-1836), and Emmanuel Levinas, this article argues that person, not as a self-sufficient subjectivity but as one interacting with others and their contexts, must be included as one of the subjects that formulates theology, along with texts, traditions, and contexts, and that interactions among the four components are the actual forces for constructing theology. The way in which theology is formulated often relates to three components-texts, traditions, and contexts-each of which has its own distinctive and interactive forces to shape theology. The major conundrum affecting methodology of contemporary theology is, however, a radical shift from text and tradition to context, as if both text and tradition had been contextual and thus theology were always to be contextual. What if our contexts are oppressive and violent? On what basis can we resist such violent contextual values? Who are 'we' here and what does 'resist' imply for theological method? Reviewing various concepts of person in Max Scheler, Korean neo-Confucian scholar Dasan Cheong Yak Yong (1762-1836), and Emmanuel Levinas, this article argues that person, not as a self-sufficient subjectivity but as one interacting with others and their contexts, must be included as one of the subjects that formulates theology, along with texts, traditions, and contexts, and that interactions among the four components are the actual forces for constructing theology.

تاريخ نشر

2019

توصيف ظاهري

99-119

عنوان

Journal of Reformed Theology

شماره جلد

13/2

شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها

1569-7312

اصطلاح موضوعی

Dasan Cheong Yak Yong

اصطلاح موضوعی

Emmanuel Levinas

اصطلاح موضوعی

General

اصطلاح موضوعی

History of Religion

اصطلاح موضوعی

interaction and resistance

اصطلاح موضوعی

Max Scheler

اصطلاح موضوعی

person and context

اصطلاح موضوعی

Religious Studies

اصطلاح موضوعی

Theology and World Christianity

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Jaeseung Cha

شماره بازیابی

10.1163/15697312-01302018

نام الکترونيکي

فرمت انتشار

p

نوع ماده

[Article]

کد کاربرگه

275578

سطح دسترسي

a

تكميل شده

Y