Papers presented at a two-day meeting at the Melbourne Business School in Feb. 1999.
یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
Includes bibliographical references and index.
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
Accounting for risk in trade agreements / David Robertson -- Risk and the WTO -- Risk and the WTO / Gary P. Sampson -- Risk, the environment and MEAs / Neil Byron -- Risk management experience in WTO dispute settlement / Thomas Cottier -- Applying SPS in WTO disputes / Joost Pauwelyn -- Managing Risk in Policymaking -- Risk assessment and risk management in policymaking / Marion Woolridge -- Allowing for risk in setting standards / Michael J. Nunn -- Public perceptions, risk communication and biotechnology / Christine R. Deane -- Negotiating Experience with Risk -- Accounting for risk in multilateral negotiations / Aynsley Kellow -- Reducing chemical risks: OECD and lead / Kaye Dal Bon -- National Risks and Quarantine Standards -- National risk management and the SPS agreement / David Wilson, Digby Gascoine -- Risk and protection for grains: analysis and quarantine / Donald MacLaren -- A business view of quarantine / Lyall Howard -- Managing Biotechnology -- Government regulations and genetically-modified organisms / Nancy F. Millis -- GM foods and global trade / David Robertson -- Concluding Summary -- Trade and risk management: exploring the issues / Ian Holland, Aynsley Kellow.
بدون عنوان
0
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
The WTO has laid the foundations for a new era of trade relations, and increased trade liberalization has improved global efficiency in production and consumption. The strengthening of trade rules, however, has increased the scope for disputes over interpretations of more extensive and complicated agreements, and has spilt over into environmental and scientific matters. One of the unforeseen consequences of the WTO agreements has been controversy over risk. This study explores aspects of risk with special reference to the WTO, where national instruments to reduce risk may conflict with internat.