Intro; Preface; Acknowledgments; A Note from Peter Klein; Contents; Contributors; Chapter 1: Introduction; 1.1 Knowledge (Chaps. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7); 1.2 Skepticism (Chaps. 8, 9, and 10); 1.3 Justification (Chaps. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15); References; Part I: Knowledge; Chapter 2: Reflective Knowledge; 2.1 Enhancing Knowledge; 2.2 Praxis; 2.3 Rational Self-Correction; 2.4 Consequences for Belief; 2.5 Responding Appropriately; References; Chapter 3: Epistemically Useful Falsehoods; 3.1 Kleinś Account; 3.2 Concerns; 3.3 Alternative Proposal; 3.4 Conclusions; References
متن يادداشت
6.3 Weak and Strong Views of Knowledge6.4 Defeasibility and Weak Knowledge; 6.5 The Defeat Intuition; 6.6 Strong Knowledge and Defeat; References; Chapter 7: A Causal Aspect of Epistemic Basing; 7.1 The Importance of Being Superstitious or Prejudiced; 7.2 Originating versus Sustaining; 7.3 Speculation and Introspection; 7.4 Apprehending Causation; 7.5 A Non-disjunctive Condition of Basing; 7.6 Factoring in Differentiating Factors; 7.7 Privations and Causation; 7.8 Prevention, Sustainment, and the Possibility of Existential Inertia; 7.9 Enough; 7.10 The Explanatory Upshot
متن يادداشت
7.11 Is `Enough ́Enough?7.12 Similarities to Disagreements over Causal Selection; 7.13 The Unimportance of Superstition and Prejudice; 7.14 A Needed Refinement; 7.15 An Illustration: The Possibility of an Extended Reliabilism; 7.16 The Future of an Illusion?; References; Part II: Scepticism; Chapter 8: The Moral Transcendental Argument against Skepticism; 8.1 Introduction; 8.2 The Transcendental Argument from Rational Agency; 8.3 Vat Morality; 8.3.1 Moral Obligation; 8.3.2 Virtue; 8.4 The Moral Transcendental Arguments; 8.4.1 The Weak Moral Transcendental Arguments
متن يادداشت
8.4.2 The Strong Moral Transcendental Argument8.4.3 The Strong (Non-transcendental) Argument from the Categorical Imperative (CI); 8.5 Can the Skeptic Retreat to Pyrrhonism?; References; Chapter 9: Epistemic Humility, Defeat, and a Defense of Moderate Skepticism; 9.1 Introduction; 9.2 An Argument for Direct Skepticism, and Kleinś Objection; 9.3 Internalism and Evidentialism; 9.4 Epistemic Limitations and Epistemic Humility; 9.5 Defeasibility and the Analysis of Knowledge; 9.6 Epistemic Limitations and Defeat; 9.7 An Argument for Moderate Skepticism
متن يادداشت
Chapter 4: Theoretical Unity in Epistemology4.1 Introduction; 4.2 The Main Tasks; 4.3 Knowledge-First Epistemology; 4.4 A Reasons-Based Alternative; 4.5 A Confirmational Approach; 4.6 Conclusion; References; Chapter 5: Accurate Enough, Comprehensive Enough, and Reasonable Enough Belief; 5.1 The Basic Claim; 5.2 Some Recent History; 5.3 Knowledge, Justification, Reliability; 5.4 Knowledge, Justification, Reliability Reconsidered; 5.5 Loosening the Link; References; Chapter 6: Knowledge, despite Evidence to the Contrary; 6.1 Headache and Weather; 6.2 Marbles
بدون عنوان
0
بدون عنوان
8
بدون عنوان
8
بدون عنوان
8
بدون عنوان
8
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
This volume features more than fifteen essays written in honor of Peter D. Klein. It explores the work and legacy of this prominent philosopher, who has had and continues to have a tremendous influence in the development of epistemology. The essays reflect the breadth and depth of Klein's work. They engage directly with his views and with the views of his interlocutors. In addition, a comprehensive introduction discusses the overall impact of Klein's philosophical work. It also explains how each of the essays in the book fits within that legacy. Coverage includes such topics as a knowledge-first account of defeasible reasoning, felicitous falsehoods, the possibility of foundationalist justification, the many formal faces of defeat, radical scepticism, and more. Overall, the book provides readers with an overview of Klein's contributions to epistemology, his importance to twentieth and twenty-first-century philosophy, and a survey of his philosophical ideas and accomplishments. It's not only a celebration of the work of an important philosopher. It also offers readers an insightful journey into the nature of knowledge, scepticism, and justification.