why the First Amendment should not protect hate speech and White supremacy /
نام نخستين پديدآور
Richard Delgado & Jean Stefancic.
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
New York :
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
New York University Press,
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
[2018]
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
xv, 164 pages ;
ابعاد
21 cm
یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
Includes bibliographical references.
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
The harms of hate speech -- Hate speech on campus -- Hate in cyberspace -- Neoliberal arguments against hate speech regulation -- Neoconservative arguments against hate-speech regulation -- How do other nations handle this problem? -- A guide for activist lawyers and judges -- "The speech we hate" : the romantic appeal of First Amendment absolutism.
بدون عنوان
0
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
"Swirling in the midst of the resurgence of neo-Nazi demonstrations, hate speech, and acts of domestic terrorism are uncomfortable questions about the limits of free speech. The United States stands apart from many other countries in that citizens have the power to say virtually anything without legal repercussions. But, in the case of white supremacy, does the First Amendment demand that we defend Nazis? In Must We Defend Nazis?, legal experts Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic argue that it should not. Updated to consider the white supremacy demonstrations and counter-protests in Charlottesville and debates about hate speech on campus and on the internet, the book offers a concise argument against total, unchecked freedom of speech. Delgado and Stefancic instead call for a system of free speech that takes into account the harms that hate speech can inflict upon disempowered, marginalized people. They examine the prevailing arguments against regulating speech, and show that they all have answers. They also show how limiting free speech would work in a legal framework and offer suggestions for activist lawyers and judges interested in approaching the hate speech controversy intelligently. As citizens are confronting free speech in contention with equal dignity, access, and respect, Must We Defend Nazis? puts aside clichés that clutter First Amendment thinking, and presents a nuanced position that recognizes the needs of our increasingly diverse society."--Publisher's website.
ویراست دیگری از اثر در قالب هم رسانه
عنوان
Must we defend Nazis?
شماره استاندارد بين المللي کتاب و موسيقي
0814718582
نام تنالگان به منزله موضوع
موضوع مستند نشده
United States., Constitution., 1st Amendment.
موضوع مستند نشده
Umschulungswerkstätten für Siedler und Auswanderer, Bitterfeld
عنوان به منزله موضوع
موضوع مستند نشده
Constitution (United States)
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Freedom of speech-- United States.
موضوع مستند نشده
Hate speech-- Law and legislation-- United States.
موضوع مستند نشده
Nazis.
موضوع مستند نشده
White supremacy movements.
موضوع مستند نشده
Freedom of speech.
موضوع مستند نشده
Hate speech-- Law and legislation.
موضوع مستند نشده
Meinungsfreiheit
موضوع مستند نشده
Nazis.
موضوع مستند نشده
Rechtsradikaler
موضوع مستند نشده
White supremacy movements.
نام جغرافیایی به منزله موضوع
موضوع مستند نشده
United States.
بدون عنوان
7
رده بندی ديویی
شماره
342
.
7308/53
ويراست
23
رده بندی کنگره
شماره رده
KF9345
شماره رده
KF4772
نشانه اثر
.
D43
2018
نشانه اثر
.
D45
2018
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )