یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
Includes bibliographical references and index
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
What Was Known? -- How Was It Known? -- What Was the Knowledge For?
بدون عنوان
0
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Doing. Shapin argues against traditional views that represent the Scientific Revolution as a coherent, cataclysmic, and once-and-for-all event. Every tendency that has customarily been identified as its modernizing essence was contested by sixteenth- and seventeenth-century practitioners with equal claims to modernity. Experimentalism was both advocated and rejected; mathematical methods were both celebrated and treated with skepticism; mechanical conceptions of nature
متن يادداشت
Rejecting the notion that there is anything like an "essence" of early modern science, Shapin emphasizes the social practices by which scientific knowledge was produced and the social purposes for which it was intended. He shows how the conduct of science emerged from a wide array of early modern philosophical agendas, political commitments, and religious beliefs. And he treats science not as a set of disembodied ideas, but as historically situated ways of knowing and
متن يادداشت
Were seen both as defining proper science and as limited in their intelligibility and application; and the role of experience in making scientific knowledge was treated in radically different ways. Yet Shapin points to the many ways that contested legacy is nevertheless rightly understood as the origin of modern science, its problems as well as its acknowledged achievements
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Science-- History
موضوع مستند نشده
Science-- history
موضوع مستند نشده
Histoire
موضوع مستند نشده
Sciences
رده بندی ديویی
شماره
509
ويراست
20
رده بندی کنگره
شماره رده
Q125
نشانه اثر
.
S5166
1996
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )