the theory of knowledge in pragmatic perspective /
نام نخستين پديدآور
Nicholas Rescher
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
[Pittsburgh, Pa.] :
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
University of Pittsburgh Press,
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
c2001
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
xi, 250 p. :
ساير جزييات
ill. ;
ابعاد
24 cm
یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
Includes bibliographical references (p. 245-248) and index
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
Knowledge of the truth in pragmatic perspective -- Epistemic justification -- Categories : a pragmatic approach -- On learned ignorance and the limits of knowledge -- The deficits of skepticism -- Cognitive realism : a perspective on existence and our knowledge of it -- Induction as enthymematic reasoning : a pragmatic perspective on inference to the best systematizaton -- On circularity and regress in rational validation -- Reification fallacies and inappropriate totalities -- What if things were different? -- Meta-knowledge and cognitive limits : rudiments of formalized epistemology
بدون عنوان
0
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Nicholas Rescher tackles the major questions of philosophical inquiry, pondering the nature of truth and existence. Rescher argues that the development of knowledge is a practice, pursued by humans because we have a need for its products. This pragmatic approach satisfies our innate urge as humans to make sense of our surroundings. Taking his discussion down to the level of particular details, and addressing such topics as inductive validation, hypostatization fallacies, and counterfactual reasoning, Rescher abandons abstract generalities in favor of concrete specifics. For example, philosophers usually insist that to reason logically from a counterfactual, we must imagine a possible world in which the statement is fact. But Rescher argues that there's no need to attempt to accept the facts of a world outside our cognition in order to reason from them. He shows us how we can use our own natural system of prioritizing to resolve the inconsistencies in such statements as, "If the Eiffel Tower were in Manhattan, then it would be in New York State." In using dozens of real-world examples such as these Rescher casts light on a wide variety of concrete issues in the classical theory of knowledge, and reassures us along the way that the inherent limitations on our knowledge are no cause for distress. In pragmatic theory and inquiry, we must accept that the best we can do is good enough, because we only have a certain (albeit large) set of tools and conceptualizations available to us
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Cognition
موضوع مستند نشده
Knowledge, Theory of
رده بندی کنگره
شماره رده
BD161
نشانه اثر
.
R4695
2001
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )