Experiences and Perceptions of HBCU Administrators About LGBTQ Student Services Decisions
General Material Designation
[Thesis]
First Statement of Responsibility
Morgan, Monique
Subsequent Statement of Responsibility
Barclay, Elaine
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Capella University
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2020
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
162
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Body granting the degree
Capella University
Text preceding or following the note
2020
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) have shown significant growth in supporting their lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer students. However, a number of these institutions do not see a need to implement specialized resources and support for their LGBTQ students. Instead, support is focused on a generalized student population. Some administrators have difficulty in adapting to LGBTQ students in the academic and social landscapes of their campus, hindering the offering of specific resources. The traditional and conservative foundations of HBCUs play a role in the decision making of administrators to offer the necessities needed for LGBTQ students. The purpose of designing this generic qualitative inquiry was to highlight the perceptions and experiences of administrators at HBCUs who are responsible for addressing gender identity/expression and LGBTQ student issues on their campuses. The primary focus was on administrator experiences relating to LGBTQ students, and gender identity/expression was of importance to address the gap in current literature. This study specifically focused on student affairs and student services offices' vice presidents, deans, and directors. It explored the participants' experiences and perceptions of LGBTQ and gender identity/expression through semi-structured interviews utilizing a purposeful sampling strategy. Bronfenbrenner's ecological and social learning theories were the theoretical frameworks guiding this study. Data analysis utilized to answer the research question, "What are the experiences and perceptions of HBCU administrators in responding to LGBTQ supportive services and issues on their campuses?" Seven themes emerged: Enduring Student Existence with Continued Subjugation, Insufficient Resources to Support LGBTQ Student Needs, Competency Limiting the Allocation of Resources and Services, LGBTQ Student Interactions Yielding Governance and Humiliation, Prior Administrative Disruption in the Implementation of Policies and Programs, Foundational Principles of Religion and Spirituality as a Hindrance, and Traditional Dispositions with Limited Evolution of Mindsets. The findings of this study revealed that despite consistent institutional and cultural barriers, HBCU administrators are responding to their LGBTQ students through approaches considered suitable, guided by the policies of their respective HBCU institutions.