explaining excessive public debt accumulation in Italy and Belgium
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2011
DISSERTATION (THESIS) NOTE
Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree
Ph.D.
Body granting the degree
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)
Text preceding or following the note
2011
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
The sovereign debt-‐crises that recently unfolded in Europe highlight how incompletely we understand why prosperous developed countries persistently accumulate debt even in the face of risk of fiscal turmoil. Scholarly research explored why countries run deficits, but it remains unexplained why countries fail to put their fiscal houses in order once public debt reaches potentially dangerous proportions. This thesis argues that the key to the problem of excessive debt accumulation is the lack of compromise among powerful socio-‐economic groups within the polity about the distribution of the necessary fiscal sacrifices. As long as each group finds it expedient to resist spending cuts and tax increases that place part of the burden of consolidation on its members, stabilization is delayed and debt is allowed to grow. The readiness of groups to reach a compromise and accept a share of the fiscal pain is a function of the economic harm each suffers from the side-‐effects of fiscal imbalances, such as high inflation or declining international competitiveness. Therefore, the insulation of socio-‐ economic actors from such side-‐effects delays stabilization. This perspective sheds new light on unintended consequences of EMU-‐membership. This explanation is couched in a society-‐centred analysis of policy making. The thesis identifies coalitions of societal interest to explain policy choices, along the lines laid down in Gourevitch's Politics in Hard Times (1986) and it uses Alesina and Drazen's (1991) war of attrition model of delayed stabilization to analyse the costs and benefits for socio-‐economic groups of resisting fiscal pain. Using this approach, it provides theoretically guided historical analyses of Belgium's and Italy's experiences with excessive debt accumulation in the 1980s, consolidation in the 1990s and mixed results in the 2000s, demonstrating how the interests of societal groups shaped the politics of fiscal policy-‐making and investigating the effect of the EMU accession on fiscal outcomes.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
HJ Public Finance
PERSONAL NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY
Barta, Zsófia
CORPORATE BODY NAME - SECONDARY RESPONSIBILITY
London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)