why the United States and Europe are becoming similar /
First Statement of Responsibility
Sergio Fabbrini.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
New York :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Oxford University Press,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2007.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
xiii, 351 pages :
Other Physical Details
illustrations ;
Dimensions
24 cm
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 301-332) and index.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Differentiation in authority structures: state, nation, and democracy in Europe and America -- Institutionalization of different governmental patterns: separation and fusion of powers in America and Europe -- Alternative paths to a modern social order: territoriality, market, and welfare in America and Europe -- Different structuring of partisan politics in America and Europe: the role of parties in the political process -- American compound democracy and its challenges: the domestic implications of global power -- Structural transformation of European politics: the growth of the supranational European Union -- Compound democracy in America and Europe: comparing the USA and the EU -- The constitutionalization of the US and the EU compound democracies -- The puzzle of compound democracy: a comparative perspective.
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
"This is a major new comparison of the American and European political systems. By deploying a powerful new model to analyse the two systems it draws some challenging conclusions about their increasing similarity. Professor Fabbrini argues that the process of regional integration in Europe over the last 60 years has significantly reduced the historical differences between the democracies on either side of the Atlantic. The EU and the US are now similar because they represent two different species of the same political genus: the compound democracy. The defining feature of compound democracy is the union of states and their citizens. Through such union, the states agree to pool their sovereignty within a larger integrated supra-state or supranational framework. They do so because these unions are primarily pacts for avoiding war. Because the states which made those unions were, and continue to be, asymmetrically correlated, any attempt to create a unified polity - that is, a political system where the decision-making power is monopolized by only one institution - is likely to fail. He goes on to argue that the US and the EU are based on a multiple diffusion of powers, which guarantees that any interest can have a voice in the decision-making process, and no majority will be able to control all the institutional levels of the polity. This type of system allows an inter-state organization to operate as a supra-state polity - but it does so at the expense of decision-making capacity and accountability."--Jacket.
OTHER EDITION IN ANOTHER MEDIUM
Title
Compound democracies.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Comparative government.
Representative government and representation-- European Union countries.
Representative government and representation-- United States.
Comparative government.
Démocratie.
Demokrati, jämförande studier.
Demokratie
Demokratieforschung
Federalism.
Fédéralisme.
Gouvernements.
Institutions politiques.
Jämförande politik.
Överstatlighet.
Partis politiques.
Politics and government.
Politique comparée.
Politisches System
Representative government and representation.
UE/CE Compétences institutionnelles.
UE/CE Institutions et organes.
UE/CE Union européenne.
Vergleichende Regierungslehre
GEOGRAPHICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Europe, Politics and government, 1989-
United States, Politics and government, 2001-2009.