Joseph V. Hughes, Jr., and Holly O. Hughes series in the presidency and leadership studies ;
Volume Designation
no. 10
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-253) and index.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Just whose Constitution is it, anyway? -- The presidential newspaper : the forgotten way of going public -- The presidential newspaper, 1836-60 : the rest of the story -- The old norm against going public : Constitutional principle or partisan fancy? -- Presidents and public communication in the late nineteenth century : the reign and fall of the Whigs -- The evolution of going public -- The legitimacy of going public -- Appendix A. Explanation of typology classifications -- Appendix B. Contents of the Washington Globe during the 1833-34 battle over Andrew Jackson's withdrawal of deposits from the Bank of the United States -- Appendix C. References (direct and indirect) to the Philippines Territory and the Spanish-American War in McKinley's speeches of late 1899.
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
"Presidents and the People offers the first comprehensive study of presidential communication with the public on policy matters and of popular and elite attitudes toward going public. Laracey demonstrates that the practice did not begin with Roosevelt's Fireside Chats, Kennedy's televised press conferences, or Bill Clinton's town meetings. Rather, historically, it has included earlier media such as presidentially sponsored newspapers. The relative absence of policy issues from earlier presidential speeches represented not an aversion to going public, but a preference for the printed word in a society in which speeches reached only the immediate audience."--Jacket.
Text of Note
"When the American president cannot get his way with Congress on something of great importance to him, he often appeals "over the heads" of Congress, directly to the American people. This kind of appeal and the frequent use of the media to generate support for presidential policies face criticism (especially from policy critics) as an unconstitutional means of subverting the executive-legislative power balance intended by the Constitution. Melvin C. Laracey, in this historical interpretation of presidential efforts to marshal public opinion in support of policy positions, challenges the notion that direct appeals are either recent or unconstitutional."
SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS NOTE (ELECTRONIC RESOURCES)
Text of Note
Master and use copy. Digital master created according to Benchmark for Faithful Digital Reproductions of Monographs and Serials, Version 1. Digital Library Federation, December 2002.
OTHER EDITION IN ANOTHER MEDIUM
Title
Presidents and the people.
International Standard Book Number
1585441805
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Communication in politics-- United States-- History.
Presidents-- United States-- Public opinion-- History.
Public opinion-- United States-- History.
Communication in politics.
Government - U.S.
LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES-- Communication Studies.
Law, Politics & Government.
Political Institutions & Public Administration - U.S., Executive Branch.