the predictable distortion of global warming by scientists, politicians, and the media /
First Statement of Responsibility
Patrick J. Michaels.
.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC
Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Washington, D.C. :
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Cato Institute,
Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.
2004.
PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Specific Material Designation and Extent of Item
1 online resource (vii, 271 pages) :
Other Physical Details
illustrations (some color), color maps
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 249-254) and index.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
1. Foreword -- 2. An introduction to global warming -- 3. Meltdown? : the truth about icecaps -- 4. All creatures cute and furry -- 5. Spin cycle : hurricanes, tornadoes, and other cyclones -- 6. Droughts and floods : worse and worse? -- 7. A greener world of changing seasons? -- 8. Global warming, disease, and death -- 9. No fact checks, please! -- 10. The "National Assessment" disaster -- 11. The predictable distortion of global warming -- 12. Breaking the cycle.
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
Why is news about global warming always bad? Why do scientists so often offer dire predictions about the future of the environment? In Meltdown, climatologist Patrick J. Michaels says it's only natural. He argues that the way we do science today--when issues compete with each other for monopoly funding by the federal government--creates a culture of exaggeration and a political community that then takes credit for having saved us from certain doom.