The Categorization of Spatial Entities in Language and Cognition; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Contributors; Introduction; 1. The categorization of spatial entities in different research fields; 1.1. Categorization; 1.2. Previous work; 1.3. Open issues; 2. Towards new directions: An overview of the contents of this volume; 2.1. Spatial entities and the structures of languages: Descriptive work; 2.2. Spatial categorization in language and cognition: Psycholinguistic and developmental studies.
Text of Note
2. Sketching three different types of prototypical schemata2.1. The force exertion originates in the figure; 2.2. The force exertion originates in the ground entity; 2.3. Opposite force exertion from two entities of the same class of objects; 3. Three cases where contre cannot be directly associated with force exertion; 3.1. Tension reduced to a perceptive effect of contact and proximity; 3.2. Visual contrast between entities reduced to their two-dimensional contour; 3.3. Direction and facing position; 4. Conclusion; References.
Text of Note
2.3. Characterizing categories of spatial entities: Formal ontology and formal semantics3. Conclusion and prospects; References; Spatial entities and the structures of languages: Descriptive work; A taxonomy of basic natural entities; 1. Introduction; 2. Basic material entities; 3. Spatial and material entities; 4. Count entities and masses; 5. Masses and aggregates; 6. Aggregates and collections; 7. Mixtures; 8. Mixtures and the use of the preposition in; 9. Conclusion; References; On the spatial meaning of contre in French; 1. Introduction.
Text of Note
4.4. A travers and NP denoting mixed entities4.5. A travers and NP denoting substances; 5. Conclusion; References; Appendixes; The linguistic categorization of spatial entities; 0. Introduction; 1. Classifiers in a typological overview of nominal classification systems; 1.1. Classifiers among other nominal classification systems; 1.2. A typology of classifier systems; 1.3. Numeral classifiers and physical properties of spatial entities; 1.4. Degrees of specificity of the classifiers; 1.5. The dynamic dimensions of classifier systems.
Text of Note
The prepositions par and à travers and the categorization of spatial entities in French1. Introduction; 2. The existing ""static'' ontology of spatial entities in French; 3. Par and the categorization of spatial entities; 3.1. Par and NP denoting space portions; 3.2. Par and NP denoting locations; 3.3. Par and NP denoting objects; 3.4. Par and NP denoting mixed entities ; 3.5. Par and NP denoting substances; 4. A travers and the categorization of spatial entities; 4.1. A travers and NP denoting space portions; 4.2. A travers and NP denoting locations; 4.3. A travers and NP denoting objects.
0
8
8
8
8
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
This paper investigates certain puzzling predications about locations and physical objects. I argue first that locations and physical objects are distinct types of things. Locations and physical objects have different individuation conditions. So this should entail that nothing is both a location and a physical object. However, there are commonplace sentences in which terms seem to denote things that are both locations and physical objects. I provide a formal model for how to understand such sentences.
OTHER EDITION IN ANOTHER MEDIUM
Title
Categorization of spatial entities in language and cognition.
TOPICAL NAME USED AS SUBJECT
Categorization (Linguistics)
Language acquisition.
Psycholinguistics.
Space and time in language.
Categorization (Linguistics)
Language acquisition.
LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES-- Linguistics-- Psycholinguistics.