عنوان

Whose Pentecostalism? Which rationality? :

Number

TLets810584

Title Proper

Whose Pentecostalism? Which rationality? :

General Material Designation

[Thesis]

First Statement of Responsibility

Frestadius, Simo Kalevi

Title Proper by Another Author

the Foursquare Gospel and Pentecostal biblical pragmatism of the Elim tradition

Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.

University of Birmingham

Date of Publication, Distribution, etc.

2018

Dissertation or thesis details and type of degree

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Text preceding or following the note

2018

Text of Note

The aim of the thesis is to provide a tradition-specific 'Pentecostal rationality.' To do this it will first analyse and evaluate some of the main contemporary Pentecostal rationalities and' epistemologies (chapter 1), before proposing that Alasdair Macintyre's tradition-focused and historically-minded narrative approach is conducive in providing a more tradition-constituted Pentecostal rationality (chapter 2). Utilising the methodological insight of Macintyre, the thesis will then provide a philosophically informed historical narrative of a Pentecostal tradition, namely, the Elim Pentecostal Church, by exploring its underlying context and roots as a classical British Pentecostal movement (chapter 3), its emergence as a religious tradition (chapter 4), and its two major 'epistemological crises' (chapters 5 & 6). Based on this historical narration, the thesis will argue that Elim's tacit Pentecostal rationality is best defined as Pentecostal Biblical Pragmatism in a Foursquare Gospel framework. This form of rationality will then be developed vis-a-vis Elim's Pentecostal concept of truth (chapter 7), biblical hermeneutics (chapter 8), and pragmatic epistemic justification in dialogue with William Alston (chapter 9).

BL Religion; BX Christian Denominations

University of Birmingham

University of Birmingham

Electronic name

p

[Thesis]

276903

a

Y