BASEES/Routledge Series on Russian and East European Studies ;
Volume Designation
116
GENERAL NOTES
Text of Note
Series number from back book cover.
INTERNAL BIBLIOGRAPHIES/INDEXES NOTE
Text of Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages 253-262) and index.
CONTENTS NOTE
Text of Note
Crossing the divide: tradition, rupture, and modernity in revolutionary Russia / Andy Willimott and Matthias Neumann -- Part I: The new state, the past, and the people. The problem of persistence / J. Arch Getty -- How revolutionary was revolutionary justice? Legal culture in Russia across the revolutionary divide / Matthew Rendle -- 'Taking a leap across the tsarist throne': revolutionizing the Russian circus / Miriam Neirick -- The Communist youth league and the construction of Soviet ohshchestvennostʹ / Matthias Neumann -- Part II: The people, the past, and the new state. For the people: the image of Ukrainian teachers as public servants / Matthew D. Pauly -- 'The woman of the Orient is not the voiceless slave anymore' -- the non-Russian women of Volga-Ural region and 'women's question' / Yulia Gradskova -- Devotion and revolution: nursing values / Susan Grant -- What did historians do at the time of the great revolution? / Vera Kaplan -- Speaking more than Bolshevik: humour, subjectivity, and crosshatching in Stalin's 1930s / Jonathan Waterlow -- Epilogue: the Russian tradition? Discourses of tradition and modernity / Peter Waldron.
0
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
"The widely accepted view of the Russian Revolution of 1917 is that it was a complete break with the past, with everything which had gone before swept away, and all aspects of politics, economy and society reformed and made new. Recently, however, historians have increasingly come to question this view, discovering that Tsarist Russia was much more reform-minded, and that the new regime contained much more continuity than has previously been acknowledged. This book presents new research findings on a range of different aspects of Russian society, both showing how there was much reform before 1917, and much continuity afterwards; and also going beyond this to show that the new Soviet regime established in the 1920s, with its vision of the New Soviet Person, was in fact based on a complicated mixture of new Soviet thinking and ideas developed before 1917 by a variety of non-Bolshevik movements"--