I --;II: Hip Joint Prostheotoplasty --;The Bone Cement Cuff in Hip Endoprostheses: Results of 80 Postmortem Studies --;Remodeling of the Femur in Conventionally-Implanted Hip Prostheses --;Causal Histogenesis (Pauwels, Kummer) and Related Biomechanical Discoveries as a Basis for the Cementless Fixation of Hip Endo-prostheses --;Biocornpatibility of Endoprosthetic Materials --;The Introduction of Bone Resorption by Prosthetic Loosening --;The Biochemistry of Implantation: Bonding of Living Bone to Stress-Bearing Endoprosthetic Components --;A Survey --;Possibilities and Limitations of the Cementless Fixation of Endoprosthetic Components --;Histologic Studies on the Incorporation of Uncemented Implants --;Metallic Implant Materials for Hip Joint Endoprostheses Designed for Cemented and Cementless Fixation --;The Use of Polymers for Endoprosthetic Components --;The Use of Carbon as an Implant Material --;Ceramic Materials for Implants --;A Metal-Ceramic Composite Designed for Cementless Fixation to Bone --;Titanium and Titanium Alloy Prostheses with Porous Fiber Metal Coatings --;Tissue-Ingrowth Implant Fixation by a Soft Porous Coating --;The Uncemented Thrust-Plate Hip Prosthesis --;First Results with the 'Thrust Plate' Total Hip Prosthesis --;Uncemented, Ceramic-Coated, Electrically-Nonconductive Implants with Physiologic Stress Transfer --;Experience with the Lord Prosthesis --;Experience with the Lord Total Hip Replacement: Biomechanics and Clinical Results --;Early Results of Judet Total Hip Replacement Arthroplasty --;First Clinical Experience with an Uncemented Modular Femoral Prosthesis System with a Wrought Ti-6 Al-4 V Stem and an A1203 Ceramic Head --;Cementless Implantation of a Modified Mueller Straight-Stem Prosthesis --;Radiologic and Clinical Foliow-Ups of Uncemented Femoral Endoprostheses with and Without Collars --;Fiber Titanium: Animal Studies and Clinical Trials --;The Current Status of Uncemented Tantalum and Niobium Femoral Endoprostheses --;First Experience with the PM Prosthesis --;First Experience with the PM Prosthesis --;Nine Years' Experience with Isoelastic Hip Endoprostheses Made of Plastic Material --;Experimental and Early Clinical Experience with an Uncemented UHMW Polyethylene Acetabular Prosthesis --;Cementless Fixation of a Polyethylene Acetabular Component --;Experience with Uncemented Polyethylene Acetabular Prostheses --;Cementless, Isoelastic Total Hip Replacement: Preliminary Report on the First 215 Consecutive Cases --;Four- to Eight-Year Postoperative Results of the Partially Uncemented Lindenhof-Type Ceramic Hip Endoprosthesis --;Total Hip Replacement with the Autophor Cement-Free Ceramic Prosthesis --;A Screw-Anchored Intramedullary Hip Prosthesis --;Experimental and Clinical Experience with Carbon Hip Endoprostheses --;Results of Animal Studies on the Use of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Prostheses --;Regeneration of the Femoral Shaft Following Revision Arthroplasties with Uncemented Plastic Prostheses --;Six Years' Experience in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties with Uncemented Ceramic Prostheses --;Revision Arthroplasties with the Isoelastic Total Hip Replacement --;31/2 Years' Results of Lord Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties and 11/2Years' Experience with Revision Arthroplasties for Loose Cemented Prostheses --;Experience with Revision Arthroplasties for Failed Cemented Total Hip Replacements Using Uncemented Lord and PM Prostheses --;Revision Arthroplasty with the Screw-Anchored Intramedullary Hip Prosthesis.
SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT
Text of Note
The main problem with regard to alloplastic joints is the loosening of the implant. Twenty years ago, Charnley first introduced bone cement to hip surgery, enabling total hip replacement to be practised on a larger scale. There is no question, however, that new approaches must be found to solving the problems of implant loosening, either by developing a new type of cement or by directly anchoring the implant without using ce ment. Much research has been done in this direction in recent years. The methods which have already been tested or are currently being tested were presented and discussed at a symposium on Cementless Fixation of Endoprostheses organized by the Orthopaedic Clinic of the University of Basel and held on 24-26 June 1982. Various possible ap proaches which might be realized in practice were discussed in a relaxed atmosphere. In addition to the biomechanical bases of cementless fixa tion of endoprostheses, the various models were discussed, with special regard to their biocompatibility, physical characteristics, design, clinical applicability, and previous clinical experience. This book contains the papers delivered at this symposium.