A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REPORTS ACROSS IRANIAN AND BRITISH NEWSPAPERS: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS APPROACH
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
/نعیمه فرید
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
tabriz: tabriz university
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
, 1387
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
170 P.
يادداشت کلی
متن يادداشت
کنایه ها
متن يادداشت
تعمیم ده ها
متن يادداشت
اسم سازها
متن يادداشت
کاراکتربندی ها
متن يادداشت
سازه وجهی
متن يادداشت
اصطلاحا ت واژگانی وساختاری
متن يادداشت
روابط قدرت
متن يادداشت
استیلای زبانشناختی
متن يادداشت
فاعل شناسی
متن يادداشت
تئوریانتقال پذیری
متن يادداشت
کاربرد ایدئولوژیکی
متن يادداشت
بررسی گفنمان انتقادی
یادداشتهای مربوط به نشر، بخش و غیره
متن يادداشت
Print
یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
bibloigraphy P.:135-148
یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها
جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
M.A.
نظم درجات
, English language teaching
زمان اعطا مدرک
2008/06/25
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) has become a very influential academic research activity across subjects in social, political, and linguistic sciences. It scrutinizes the power relations, ideological manipulations, and hegemony. Critical analysis of the language of journalism is used here as an attempt to explain how a single reality can be presented and viewed entirely differently by different people having a range of religious and political perspectives, by showing how pro- and anti-Iranian newspapers can represent their point of view and their different ideologies through using language. This study presents a corpus consisting of three pro-Iranian reports besides three anti-Iranian ones. It has tried to analyze the six selected reports in terms of Halliday's (1994) Transitivity Theory and Van Dijk's (1998) categories. These samples concern ideological effects introduced by Van Dijk including the use of the elements listed as Actor description, Modality, Nominalization, Comparison, Categorization, Evidentiality, Example, Illustration, Generalization, Hyperbole, Implication, Irony, Lexicalization, National Self-glorification, Negative Other-presentation, Norm expression, Number game, Positive Self-presentation, Vagueness, Euphemism, Presupposition, and Authority. Such an analysis has tried to show how the reports are similar or different regarding pro- and anti-Iranian reports in terms of lexico-grammatical choices by applying Halliday's process types including Material, Mental, Verbal, Relational, and Possessive processes and how the lexico-grammatical choices are related to ideological positions. The findings corroborated the fact that Critical Discourse Analysis can be an appropriate method for the detection of biased and manipulative language. The results indicated that there are significant differences between Pro- and Anti-Iranian newspapers in their ideological points and in their in terms of lexico-grammatical choices. These findings may have some implications for teaching of academic writing especially to foreign language learners of English..
عنوان ترجمه شده توسط فهرست نویس
عنوان ترجمه شده
بررسی رابطه بین ایدلولوژی و نحوه ی گزارش اخباردر روزنامه های ایرانی و غربی
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
REPORTS
موضوع مستند نشده
BRITISH NEWSPAPERS
موضوع مستند نشده
IRANIAN NEWSPAPERS
موضوع مستند نشده
COMPARAT
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Farid, Naeeme
نام شخص - ( مسئولیت معنوی درجه دوم )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Farrokhi, Supervisor
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Ansarin
مبدا اصلی
کشور
ایران
شماره دستیابی
شماره بازیابی
پایان نامهPE,1127,.F2C6,1387
دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی
نام ميزبان
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF REPORTS ACROSS IRANIAN AND BRITISH NEWSPAPERS: A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS APPROACH