Introduction: Arguing about arguments, analyzing analysis / Matti Häyry [and others] -- Global bioethics and 'erroneous reason': fallacies across the borders / Sirkku Kristiina Hellsten -- Is bioethics only for the rich and powerful? / Søren Holm -- Do we need (bio)ethical principles? / Simona Giordano -- Bioethics and Stephen Toulmin's argumentation theory / Doris Schroeder and Peter Herissone-Kelly -- The use of examples in bioethics / Harry Lesser -- Moral intuitions in bioethics / Harry Lesser -- Toward the "fair use" of empirical evidence in ethical arguments: vaccination, MMR and disagreement / Angus Dawson -- An assessment of the normal function model and implications for enhancement / Cathleen Schulte -- On the distinction between positive and negative eugenics / Stephen Wilkinson -- Genetic fallacy and some other concerns in behavioral genetics / Niall W.R. Scott -- Eugenics: enhancing individuals or populations? / Niall W.R. Scott -- Harm, law and reproductive / Anna Smajdor Cloning -- An analysis of some arguments for and against human reproduction / Matti Häyry -- Does the baby selling objection to commercial surrogacy misuse Immanuel Kant? / Stuart Oultram -- Prozac, authenticity, and the Aristotelian mean / John McMillan -- The case of self-demand amputees: a dilemma for professional ethics? / Floris Tomasini -- Enzyme replacement therapy and the rule of rescue / Mark Sheehan -- Is "therapeutic research" a misnomer? / Peter Lucas -- Can the subject-of-a-life criterion help grant rights to non-persons? / Lisa Bortolotti -- Determining the limits of justified paternalism: is maximizing autonomy the key? / Jane Wilson -- The who or what of Steve: severe cognitive impairment and its implications / Simo Vehmas.
0
This book consists of twenty-one essays in bioethics. Some concern such issues as resource allocation in healthcare, reproductive cloning, eugenics, and the morality of human reproduction. Others concern methodological issues in bioethics, such as the role of examples, moral intuitions and empirical evidence. All have something important to say about the nature and place of arguments and analysis in bioethics.