• صفحه اصلی
  • جستجوی پیشرفته
  • فهرست کتابخانه ها
  • درباره پایگاه
  • ارتباط با ما
  • تاریخچه

عنوان
Views of Muslim Religious Leaders on Violence against Married Women

پدید آورنده
Suleman, Muhammed

موضوع
Divorce,Islamic law,Religion,Women

رده

کتابخانه
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

محل استقرار
استان: قم ـ شهر: قم

مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

شماره کتابشناسی ملی

شماره
TLpq2522662098

زبان اثر

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن
انگلیسی

عنوان و نام پديدآور

عنوان اصلي
Views of Muslim Religious Leaders on Violence against Married Women
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Suleman, Muhammed
نام ساير پديدآوران
Naidoo, Kammila

وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
University of Johannesburg (South Africa)
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2019

مشخصات ظاهری

نام خاص و کميت اثر
278

یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها

جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
D.Litt. et Phil.
کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده
University of Johannesburg (South Africa)
امتياز متن
2019

یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده

متن يادداشت
Muslim religious leaders are commonly accused of adopting a conservative interpretation of Islam that guides the way in which they counsel married women on their rights to divorce and how they should address violence in the marital context. They have also been viewed as favouring male-dominant positions, protecting abusive husbands and adopting a reconciliation-at-all-cost approach. Scholars generally argue that women lack representation because the religious bodies which deal with domestic violence are made up predominantly of men. Despite this, and various accusations levelled at religious leaders, their voices are largely absent in academic studies. This thesis sought to interrogate Muslim religious leaders' views of why domestic violence occurs in the Muslim South African community, why Muslim married women might experience it, what the drivers are, and how the problem could be addressed. The integration of both feminist and family theories was relevant for this study because while patriarchy is important to assess, experience of structural issues as raised by some family theorists is equally crucial. Beyond these frameworks, the use of Bourdieu became important, particularly insofar as habitus and various intersecting fields could be illuminated. The intersecting fields in this study are Islam, family, patriarchy and the economy. These fields influence the amount of resources or capital women have at their disposal. When families place their status ahead of society and command women to respect their husbands unconditionally, they are undermining women's rights to recourse and emancipation, thus promoting cultural dominance of one group over another. Methodologically, a qualitative research paradigm was chosen as it places emphasis on context and nuanced meanings. This paradigm allowed me to carefully explore the way in which religious leaders think about domestic violence and the rationale behind their approaches. In May 2017, I set out to conduct in-depth semistructure d interviews within the Gauteng region, using purposive and snowball sampling. The insider-outsider phenomena which I was alerted to at the proposal stage of my doctorate, debilitated the fieldwork for a while as religious leaders showed a level of distrust towards me. Despite these difficulties, I managed to conduct in-depth interviews with 13 participants, which were analysed utilising thematic analyses. The findings show that religious leaders represent a complex grouping-there is tension in their narratives between 'conservative thinking' and 'more progressive approaches'. While the y do provide emotional and economic support and show a favourable attitude towards counselling, some of them are against the implementation of Muslim Personal Law which is ironic, given that they favour women using the protective structures of the state, such as the police. They revealed that they struggle with patriarchal practices, because while they were in favour of women religious leaders becoming vi involved, they were against them having a say in awarding women a divorce via the judicial process. In certain senses, while they suggest that they want to eradicate structural, cultural and direct violence, their refusal to transcend their conservative pro-patriarchal thinking results in their engendering a problematic environment that might persist in fostering cultural and structural violence that sustains, rather than ends, violence against married women.

موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)

موضوع مستند نشده
Divorce
موضوع مستند نشده
Islamic law
موضوع مستند نشده
Religion
موضوع مستند نشده
Women

نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Naidoo, Kammila
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Suleman, Muhammed

دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی

نام الکترونيکي
 مطالعه متن کتاب 

وضعیت انتشار

فرمت انتشار
p

اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی

نوع ماده
[Thesis]
کد کاربرگه
276903

اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد

سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y

پیشنهاد / گزارش اشکال

اخطار! اطلاعات را با دقت وارد کنید
ارسال انصراف
این پایگاه با مشارکت موسسه علمی - فرهنگی دارالحدیث و مرکز تحقیقات کامپیوتری علوم اسلامی (نور) اداره می شود
مسئولیت صحت اطلاعات بر عهده کتابخانه ها و حقوق معنوی اطلاعات نیز متعلق به آنها است
برترین جستجوگر - پنجمین جشنواره رسانه های دیجیتال