A Comparison of the Party of Justice and Development in Morocco and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt
نام نخستين پديدآور
Katarína Škrabáková
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Leiden
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Brill
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
This paper examines the legislative recruitment of women from conservative Islamist parties. It questions the common assumption that generally all Islamist parties are equally hostile to political participation and representation of women. For this purpose, two of the electorally most successful Islamist groups in the MENA region are compared, namely the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and its Moroccan offshoot, the Party of Justice and Development (PJD). The article seeks an explanation for diverging trends in female candidacy between these conservative religious movements, using the traditional supply and demand model of candidate selection. It argues that the less centralized and the more institutionalized parties (as is the case with the PJD) seem to be better equipped to facilitate women's candidacy than the more oligarchic ones (the MB). In order to fully grasp the reasons behind the diverging trends in the nomination of female candidates from both Islamist parties, cultural factors are scrutinized as well. The article highlights the limits of the supply and demand model of candidate selection, which cannot explain instances of unexpected change in recruitment strategies based on external interference. Furthermore, it does not provide us the means to assess the impact of individual candidates' 'feminist credentials' on overall female representation. This paper examines the legislative recruitment of women from conservative Islamist parties. It questions the common assumption that generally all Islamist parties are equally hostile to political participation and representation of women. For this purpose, two of the electorally most successful Islamist groups in the MENA region are compared, namely the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (MB) and its Moroccan offshoot, the Party of Justice and Development (PJD). The article seeks an explanation for diverging trends in female candidacy between these conservative religious movements, using the traditional supply and demand model of candidate selection. It argues that the less centralized and the more institutionalized parties (as is the case with the PJD) seem to be better equipped to facilitate women's candidacy than the more oligarchic ones (the MB). In order to fully grasp the reasons behind the diverging trends in the nomination of female candidates from both Islamist parties, cultural factors are scrutinized as well. The article highlights the limits of the supply and demand model of candidate selection, which cannot explain instances of unexpected change in recruitment strategies based on external interference. Furthermore, it does not provide us the means to assess the impact of individual candidates' 'feminist credentials' on overall female representation.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2017
توصيف ظاهري
329-359
عنوان
Die Welt des Islams
شماره جلد
57/3-4
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
1570-0607
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
centralization
اصطلاح موضوعی
female candidacy
اصطلاح موضوعی
institutionalization
اصطلاح موضوعی
participation
اصطلاح موضوعی
History & Culture
اصطلاح موضوعی
Islamist parties
اصطلاح موضوعی
Middle East and Islamic Studies
اصطلاح موضوعی
Sociology & Anthropology
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )