عنوان

Did Jesus Rise Bodily From the Dead? Yes and no!

شماره

LA126402

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن

انگلیسی

عنوان اصلي

Did Jesus Rise Bodily From the Dead? Yes and no!

نام عام مواد

[Article]

نام نخستين پديدآور

Pieter Craffert

محل نشرو پخش و غیره

Leiden

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره

Brill

متن يادداشت

Did Jesus rise bodily from the dead? Even those who give an affirmative answer to this question do not all agree on the reasons why. According to the Gospels, Jesus's close circle of followers believed in his resurrection because he has appeared to them. For almost twenty centuries, Christian believers affirmed a bodily resurrection based on their belief in one of the central elements of the Christian belief system. In response to the rationalist denial of such beliefs by critical New Testament scholarship, orthodox New Testament scholars design affirmations based on historical proof. They defend a literal bodily resurrection based on historical plausibility and the possibility of divine intervention in a world-view which tolerates paranormal events in history against the scientific rejection of a bodily resurrection by critical scholars. The aim of this article is to offer both a meta-analysis of these viewpoints about Jesus's resurrection and an alternative understanding of the resurrection accounts in the New Testament itself. The social-scientific perspective employed provides both tools for the analysis of the above positions and the framework for offering an alternative answer to the question of Jesus's literal bodily resurrection. Did Jesus rise bodily from the dead? Even those who give an affirmative answer to this question do not all agree on the reasons why. According to the Gospels, Jesus's close circle of followers believed in his resurrection because he has appeared to them. For almost twenty centuries, Christian believers affirmed a bodily resurrection based on their belief in one of the central elements of the Christian belief system. In response to the rationalist denial of such beliefs by critical New Testament scholarship, orthodox New Testament scholars design affirmations based on historical proof. They defend a literal bodily resurrection based on historical plausibility and the possibility of divine intervention in a world-view which tolerates paranormal events in history against the scientific rejection of a bodily resurrection by critical scholars. The aim of this article is to offer both a meta-analysis of these viewpoints about Jesus's resurrection and an alternative understanding of the resurrection accounts in the New Testament itself. The social-scientific perspective employed provides both tools for the analysis of the above positions and the framework for offering an alternative answer to the question of Jesus's literal bodily resurrection.

تاريخ نشر

2008

توصيف ظاهري

133-153

عنوان

Religion and Theology

شماره جلد

15/1-2

شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها

1574-3012

اصطلاح موضوعی

ANTHROPOLOGY

اصطلاح موضوعی

CULTURAL REALITIES

اصطلاح موضوعی

ETHNOCENTRISM

اصطلاح موضوعی

HISTORICAL JESUS

اصطلاح موضوعی

LITERAL BODILY RESURRECTION

اصطلاح موضوعی

RESURRECTION

اصطلاح موضوعی

SHAMAN

اصطلاح موضوعی

SOCIAL-SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE IN NEW TESTAMENT STUDIES

اصطلاح موضوعی

VISIONARY EXPERIENCES

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Pieter Craffert

شماره بازیابی

10.1163/157430108X308181

نام الکترونيکي

فرمت انتشار

p

نوع ماده

[Article]

کد کاربرگه

275578

سطح دسترسي

a

تكميل شده

Y