The Sacred Orders of Finnish Political Discourse on the Revision of the Blasphemy Law
نام عام مواد
[Article]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Tuomas Äystö
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Leiden
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Brill
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
This article examines how Finnish politicians constructed the legal protection of religion and the relationship between religion and society during the process of revising the blasphemy and religious insult sections of the Finnish criminal code in the late 1990s. In doing so, it analyzes their discourses on religion and the sacred. It identifies two "sacred orders" in these discourses. One is a "secular sacred order," concerned with the defense of religious plurality, secular progress, and the principles of public order and freedom of religion. The other is a "Christian sacred order"; it defends Finnish national and cultural identity, is connected to the national form of Christianity, and refers explicitly to the Christian God. These orders represent different views on the role of religion in society but, as the article shows, during the legislative process proponents of both invoked a category of religion that presumed a Christian prototype. Based on this analysis, the article suggests that theories utilizing the Durkheimian notion of the sacred should take into account issues of power, the nature of sacred things as social constructions and thus variable, and the existence of hierarchical relationships between different sacred things. This article examines how Finnish politicians constructed the legal protection of religion and the relationship between religion and society during the process of revising the blasphemy and religious insult sections of the Finnish criminal code in the late 1990s. In doing so, it analyzes their discourses on religion and the sacred. It identifies two "sacred orders" in these discourses. One is a "secular sacred order," concerned with the defense of religious plurality, secular progress, and the principles of public order and freedom of religion. The other is a "Christian sacred order"; it defends Finnish national and cultural identity, is connected to the national form of Christianity, and refers explicitly to the Christian God. These orders represent different views on the role of religion in society but, as the article shows, during the legislative process proponents of both invoked a category of religion that presumed a Christian prototype. Based on this analysis, the article suggests that theories utilizing the Durkheimian notion of the sacred should take into account issues of power, the nature of sacred things as social constructions and thus variable, and the existence of hierarchical relationships between different sacred things.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2017
توصيف ظاهري
294-321
عنوان
Numen
شماره جلد
64/2-3
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
1568-5276
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
blasphemy
اصطلاح موضوعی
Finland
اصطلاح موضوعی
law
اصطلاح موضوعی
politics
اصطلاح موضوعی
religion
اصطلاح موضوعی
sacred
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )