عنوان

What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much-and Not What Wiebe Claims

شماره

LA121602

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن

انگلیسی

عنوان اصلي

What's in a (Change of) Name? Much-but Not That Much-and Not What Wiebe Claims

نام عام مواد

[Article]

نام نخستين پديدآور

Satoko Fujiwara, Tim Jensen, Satoko Fujiwara, et al.

محل نشرو پخش و غیره

Leiden

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره

Brill

متن يادداشت

Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to "International Association for the Study of Religions." His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name. Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to "International Association for the Study of Religions." His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name. Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to "International Association for the Study of Religions." His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name. Donald Wiebe claims that the IAHR leadership (already before an Extended Executive Committee (EEC) meeting in Delphi) had decided to water down the academic standards of the IAHR with a proposal to change its name to "International Association for the Study of Religions." His criticism, we argue, is based on a series of misunderstandings as regards: 1) the difference between the consultative body (EEC) and the decision-making body (EC), 2) the difference between the preliminary points of view of individuals and final proposals by the EC, 3) personal conversations, 4) the link between the proposal to change the name and the wish to tighten up the academic profile of the IAHR. Moreover, if the final decision-making bodies, the International Committee and the General Assembly, adopt the proposal, the new name as little as the old can make the IAHR more or less scientific. Tightening up the academic, scientific profile of the IAHR takes more than a change of name.

تاريخ نشر

2020

توصيف ظاهري

159-184

عنوان

Method & Theory in the Study of Religion

شماره جلد

32/2

شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها

1570-0682

اصطلاح موضوعی

EASR

اصطلاح موضوعی

globalization

اصطلاح موضوعی

IAHR

اصطلاح موضوعی

International Association for the History of Religions

اصطلاح موضوعی

Marburg

اصطلاح موضوعی

NAASR

اصطلاح موضوعی

NVMEN

اصطلاح موضوعی

Religionswissenschaft

اصطلاح موضوعی

scientific study of religion

اصطلاح موضوعی

study of religions

اصطلاح موضوعی

Zwi Werblowsky

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Satoko Fujiwara

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Tim Jensen

شماره بازیابی

10.1163/15700682-12341478

نام الکترونيکي

فرمت انتشار

p

نوع ماده

[Article]

کد کاربرگه

275578

سطح دسترسي

a

تكميل شده

Y