Was Arminius an (Unwitting) Determinist? Another Look at Arminius's Modal Logic
نام عام مواد
[Article]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Thomas H. McCall
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Leiden
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Brill
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Eef Dekker argues, on the basis of a letter from Jacob Arminius to Johannes Uytenbogaert in 1598, that Arminius's modal logic commits him to determinism. In this essay, I revisit Arminius's modal logic. I grant that Dekker may be correct in his analysis of this letter and its contents, but I argue that Arminius's musings in this letter are not representative of his mature thought. I argue that Arminius significantly alters his views, and that with a bit of further correction Arminius's position can avoid determinism. Eef Dekker argues, on the basis of a letter from Jacob Arminius to Johannes Uytenbogaert in 1598, that Arminius's modal logic commits him to determinism. In this essay, I revisit Arminius's modal logic. I grant that Dekker may be correct in his analysis of this letter and its contents, but I argue that Arminius's musings in this letter are not representative of his mature thought. I argue that Arminius significantly alters his views, and that with a bit of further correction Arminius's position can avoid determinism.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2014
توصيف ظاهري
301-309
عنوان
Journal of Reformed Theology
شماره جلد
8/3
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
1569-7312
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
determinism
اصطلاح موضوعی
Eef Dekker
اصطلاح موضوعی
Franciscus Gomarus
اصطلاح موضوعی
Jacob Arminius
اصطلاح موضوعی
modality
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )