What If? An Experiment to Include a Religious Narrative in the Approach of the European Court of Human Rights
نام عام مواد
[Article]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Anicée Van Engeland
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Leiden
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Brill | Nijhoff
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
According to some interpretations of Islam supported by gender activists, the veil can be perceived as a passport that enables women to participate in public affairs. This argument has been overlooked by the courts, including the European Court of Human Rights. The latter has adopted a discourse that considers the veil to be a threat to public order and gender equality, and more recently, an obstacle to social cohesion. By doing so, the Court has excluded veiled European Muslim women from the public sphere. The Court has justified curbing freedom of religion by granting states a wide margin of appreciation on the basis of the concept of "living together." I argue that the Court needs to take the "passport veil" into account to be consistent with its argument on living together. A shift of approach and discourse would constitute a new way of understanding integration through the veil.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2019
توصيف ظاهري
213-241
عنوان
Journal of Law, Religion and State
شماره جلد
7/2
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
2212-4810
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
Comparative Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
European Court of Human Rights
اصطلاح موضوعی
History of Religion
اصطلاح موضوعی
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
International Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Islamic Law
اصطلاح موضوعی
Middle East and Islamic Studies
اصطلاح موضوعی
Religion & Society
اصطلاح موضوعی
Religious Studies
اصطلاح موضوعی
social cohesion
اصطلاح موضوعی
Social Sciences
اصطلاح موضوعی
veil
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )