While the Charlie Hebdo attacks unleashed a highly distinctive national debate within France, that debate also serves to throw into sharp relief the deepening tensions generated by increasingly complex relationships between the state and religion across much of Europe, not least due to the arrival of immigrant minority faiths wishing to advance claims in what is widely assumed to be 'secular' public space. After reviewing these tensions, the article distinguishes five current European responses to them and proposes a model of 'principled pluralism' as a theologically defensible option. The original theological roots of such a model are outlined and six indicative contemporary practical implications proposed. While the Charlie Hebdo attacks unleashed a highly distinctive national debate within France, that debate also serves to throw into sharp relief the deepening tensions generated by increasingly complex relationships between the state and religion across much of Europe, not least due to the arrival of immigrant minority faiths wishing to advance claims in what is widely assumed to be 'secular' public space. After reviewing these tensions, the article distinguishes five current European responses to them and proposes a model of 'principled pluralism' as a theologically defensible option. The original theological roots of such a model are outlined and six indicative contemporary practical implications proposed.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2016
توصيف ظاهري
354-380
عنوان
International Journal of Public Theology
شماره جلد
10/3
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
1569-7320
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
freedom of speech
اصطلاح موضوعی
laïcité
اصطلاح موضوعی
pluralism
اصطلاح موضوعی
religion
اصطلاح موضوعی
secularism
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )