Think outside the box! Jung, Lévi-Strauss, and postcolonialism (individual, society, and institutes):
نام عام مواد
[Article]
ساير اطلاعات عنواني
spectrum of psychology and sociology
نام نخستين پديدآور
Tatsuhiro Nakajima
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Leiden
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Brill
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
The resemblance between Claude Lévi-Strauss's structuralism and Carl Jung's theory of the archetypes of the collective unconscious has been occasionally discussed. However, Lévi-Strauss followed the foundation of Émile Durkheim and Marcel Mauss, stressing the group dynamics of structural anthropology, whereas Jung's psychology is an individual psychology. Jung employed myths as a series of images to interpret symbols of the collective unconscious, whereas Lévi-Strauss adopted theories of linguistics to analyse myths as narratives. From Lévi-Strauss's point of view, a single cultural complex cannot be isolated from other groups of cultural complexes, as they are relational with regard to the exchange of symbols and signs. Lévi-Strauss's comparison of the European and Native American twin mythology is a case study of the cultural complex when it is read from the perspective of Jungian psychology. How can we approach the mythology that is not one's own culture? Do we impose our own mythology onto others'? Or do we analyse them more objectively as systems of thought? The trickster, for example, is a discourse by Western culture about Western culture, and it has a very different meaning for Native American people. With a prophetic warning to future generations, Lévi-Strauss died in 2009 - his centennial year. The resemblance between Claude Lévi-Strauss's structuralism and Carl Jung's theory of the archetypes of the collective unconscious has been occasionally discussed. However, Lévi-Strauss followed the foundation of Émile Durkheim and Marcel Mauss, stressing the group dynamics of structural anthropology, whereas Jung's psychology is an individual psychology. Jung employed myths as a series of images to interpret symbols of the collective unconscious, whereas Lévi-Strauss adopted theories of linguistics to analyse myths as narratives. From Lévi-Strauss's point of view, a single cultural complex cannot be isolated from other groups of cultural complexes, as they are relational with regard to the exchange of symbols and signs. Lévi-Strauss's comparison of the European and Native American twin mythology is a case study of the cultural complex when it is read from the perspective of Jungian psychology. How can we approach the mythology that is not one's own culture? Do we impose our own mythology onto others'? Or do we analyse them more objectively as systems of thought? The trickster, for example, is a discourse by Western culture about Western culture, and it has a very different meaning for Native American people. With a prophetic warning to future generations, Lévi-Strauss died in 2009 - his centennial year.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2018
توصيف ظاهري
237-248
عنوان
International Journal of Jungian Studies
شماره جلد
10/3
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
1940-9060
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
collective unconscious
اصطلاح موضوعی
colonialism
اصطلاح موضوعی
cultural complex
اصطلاح موضوعی
Lévi-Strauss
اصطلاح موضوعی
Native American mythology
اصطلاح موضوعی
trickster
اصطلاح موضوعی
twin mythology
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )