• صفحه اصلی
  • جستجوی پیشرفته
  • فهرست کتابخانه ها
  • درباره پایگاه
  • ارتباط با ما
  • تاریخچه

عنوان
Beyond National Origins:

پدید آورنده
Wolgin, Philip Eric

موضوع

رده

کتابخانه
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

محل استقرار
استان: قم ـ شهر: قم

مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

شماره کتابشناسی ملی

شماره
TL1vr7k843

زبان اثر

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن
انگلیسی

عنوان و نام پديدآور

عنوان اصلي
Beyond National Origins:
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Wolgin, Philip Eric
عنوان اصلي به قلم نويسنده ديگر
The Development of Modern Immigration Policymaking, 1948-1968
نام ساير پديدآوران
Hollinger, David A

وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
UC Berkeley
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2011

یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها

کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده
UC Berkeley
امتياز متن
2011

یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده

متن يادداشت
This dissertation examines the development of the modern system of immigration policy. In doing so I shift the lens of analysis from singular strands of legislation to the most enduring facet of postwar reform: the three major categories of permanent immigrant admissions - family reunion, labor-market, and refugee - enshrined in the Hart-Celler Act of 1965. Hart-Celler ended the race-based national origins quota system which had governed immigrant admissions since the 1920s, and implemented a new preference system that allotted just under three quarters of all visas to family reunification, with the remainder for labor migrants and refugees. I ask why policymakers created a system so heavily weighted toward family reunification and how they decided who qualified for each admissions preference. The idea of using these specific categories, and of allotting the lion's share of visas to family, marked a revolutionary break from the past. Far from being primordial or pre-ordained, the shape of the preferences emerged from two decades of political struggle.Examining the development of these categories of admission within one overarching admissions structure allows me to detail the long history of policy development. Using a range of archival sources, including the under-utilized State Department records, I follow political and legal processes as they emerged and intertwined from multiple venues, including the executive branch, federal bureaucracies, congress, and civil society groups. My research shows that more than any other factor - more than the will of powerful individuals; of the sausage-making legislative process; or the shape of political coalitions and public opinion - what mattered most for the development of the preference categories, and thus for immigration policymaking itself, was a series of successful short-sighted defenses of older policies and unsuccessful reform efforts. These early attempts at defense and reform in the late-1940s to early-1960s did not answer the key question of immigration policy in the postwar era: how to regulate admissions without the use of the race-based quotas. But, over the course of two decades, they set in motion a positive feedback cycle that, once full-scale legislative reform was possible with the Hart-Celler Act, pushed policymakers to implement a heavily family-reunification based system. Critically, this feedback loop functioned largely below the radar, constraining policymaking in a manner overlooked even by those officials most intimately connected with immigration reform. While other pieces of legislation, such as the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 and the Immigration Act of 1990, have made cosmetic changes to the admissions regime, for example raising the numbers of people admissible each year, the foundations of the system - the three categories and emphasis on family reunification - remain the same. These three preferences, above any other facet of policymaking, have shaped the modern immigration regime, with all of its trials and tribulations, including long backlogs in the family preference categories, large numbers of undocumented immigrants, and a disconnect between labor-market needs and available visas. Though many of the constrictions on policymaking from the postwar era emerged from the peculiar history of the national origins quotas, I conclude that the lessons about policy defense and failed reform are applicable to contemporary immigration policymaking.

نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Wolgin, Philip Eric

نام شخص - ( مسئولیت معنوی درجه دوم )

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Hollinger, David A

شناسه افزوده (تنالگان)

مستند نام تنالگان تاييد نشده
UC Berkeley

دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی

نام الکترونيکي
 مطالعه متن کتاب 

وضعیت انتشار

فرمت انتشار
p

اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی

نوع ماده
[Thesis]
کد کاربرگه
276903

اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد

سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y

پیشنهاد / گزارش اشکال

اخطار! اطلاعات را با دقت وارد کنید
ارسال انصراف
این پایگاه با مشارکت موسسه علمی - فرهنگی دارالحدیث و مرکز تحقیقات کامپیوتری علوم اسلامی (نور) اداره می شود
مسئولیت صحت اطلاعات بر عهده کتابخانه ها و حقوق معنوی اطلاعات نیز متعلق به آنها است
برترین جستجوگر - پنجمین جشنواره رسانه های دیجیتال