• صفحه اصلی
  • جستجوی پیشرفته
  • فهرست کتابخانه ها
  • درباره پایگاه
  • ارتباط با ما
  • تاریخچه

عنوان
Flourishing and Discordance:

پدید آورنده
Stavrianakis, Anthony

موضوع

رده

کتابخانه
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

محل استقرار
استان: قم ـ شهر: قم

مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

شماره کتابشناسی ملی

شماره
TL2b50r68z

زبان اثر

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن
انگلیسی

عنوان و نام پديدآور

عنوان اصلي
Flourishing and Discordance:
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Stavrianakis, Anthony
عنوان اصلي به قلم نويسنده ديگر
On Two Modes of Human Science Engagement with Synthetic Biology
نام ساير پديدآوران
Rabinow, Paul

وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره

تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2012

یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها

کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده
Rabinow, Paul
امتياز متن
2012

یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده

متن يادداشت
This dissertation takes up the theme of collaboration between the human sciences and natural sciences and asks how technical, veridictional and ethical vectors in such co-labor can be inquired into today. I specify the problem of collaboration, between forms of knowledge, as a contemporary one. This contemporary problem links the recent past of the institutional relations between the human and natural sciences to a present experience of anthropological engagement with a novel field of bioengineering practice, called synthetic biology. I compare two modes of engagement, in which I participated during 2006-2011. One project, called Human Practices, based within the Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center (SynBERC), instantiated an anthropological mode of inquiry, explicitly oriented to naming ethical problems for collaboration. This project, conducted in collaboration with Paul Rabinow and Gaymon Bennett, took as a challenge the invention of an appropriate practice to indeterminate ethical problems. Flourishing, a translation of the ancient Greek term eudaemonia, was a central term in orienting the Human Practices project. This term was used to posit ethical questions outside of the instrumental rationality of the sciences, and on which the Human Practices project would seek to work. A second project, the Socio-Technical Integration Research (STIR) project, based at the Arizona State University's Center for Nanotechnology in Society (ASU-CNS), was an explicitly `method driven' project, whose rationale was for human scientists, through the use of a method, to act as mediums for the reflexivity, and self-observation, of research scientists relative to their on-going projects. The aim was for such interaction and self-observation to produce modulations of thought and practice within research settings. I used the method, from May-December 2009, within a bioengineering laboratory of a newly established Department of Biosystems science and engineering (D-BSSE) at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH). The comparison on which I reflect is between one mode of engagement characterized by its encompassing ethical orientation, and a mode characterized by it methodology and orientation to the latent social aspects of research decisions, made within on-going work. With respect to their relation, I diagnose the problematic effects of parameterizing the goods of biology and the stakes of collaboration solely within the dominant ameliorative and industrial norms and values of the scientific field. The general demand in the present, to modify the practice of science with respect to ethical questions, was in this case unable to be actualized. I argue that the projects in which I participated were structured in a double bind situation in which the transformation of the ethical field in which bioscience operates, was simultaneously demanded (by a range of funding agencies, political activists, bio scientists and human scientists) and undermined. I argue that the discord comes from incommensurable conceptions and embodied stances to the ethical ends and practices of knowing. This blockage is set within a broader historical problematization of the relation between forms and practices of science, within research venues from the mid-19th Century to the present. The intellectual and ethical breakdowns arising from within the practice of collaboration in the present, between a specific set of bioscientific and engineering practices and two social science modes of engagement, are thus situated within a historical problematization of the relation of science and ethics.

نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Rojas, Felipe

نام شخص - ( مسئولیت معنوی درجه دوم )

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Stavrianakis, Anthony

شناسه افزوده (تنالگان)

مستند نام تنالگان تاييد نشده
UC Berkeley

دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی

نام الکترونيکي
 مطالعه متن کتاب 

وضعیت انتشار

فرمت انتشار
p

اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی

نوع ماده
[Thesis]
کد کاربرگه
276903

اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد

سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y

پیشنهاد / گزارش اشکال

اخطار! اطلاعات را با دقت وارد کنید
ارسال انصراف
این پایگاه با مشارکت موسسه علمی - فرهنگی دارالحدیث و مرکز تحقیقات کامپیوتری علوم اسلامی (نور) اداره می شود
مسئولیت صحت اطلاعات بر عهده کتابخانه ها و حقوق معنوی اطلاعات نیز متعلق به آنها است
برترین جستجوگر - پنجمین جشنواره رسانه های دیجیتال