convergence or divergence in national approaches? /
نام نخستين پديدآور
Jung Cheol Shin, Barbara M. Kehm, Glen A. Jones, editors.
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Cham, Switzerland :
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Springer,
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
[2018]
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
1 online resource
فروست
عنوان فروست
Knowledge studies in higher education,
مشخصه جلد
volume 5
شاپا ي ISSN فروست
2566-8315 ;
یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
Includes bibliographical references.
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
Intro; Preface; Contents; About the Editors and Authors; Chapter 1: The Increasing Importance, Growth, andEvolution ofDoctoral Education; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 Different Societal Perspectives onDoctoral Education; 1.3 Knowledge Society andDemands forDoctoral Degree Holders; 1.4 Competency Development intheProfessional Society; 1.5 Major Issues toBeAddressed inThis Book; References; Part I: Doctoral Education in European Systems; Chapter 2: Doctoral Education, Training andWork inGermany; 2.1 Introduction.
متن يادداشت
2.2 German Traditions andtheDevelopment ofDoctoral Training intheTwentieth Century2.3 The Quantitative Development ofDoctoral Training intheTwenty-First Century; 2.4 Critique ofGerman Traditions andtheEmergence andGrowth ofStructured Doctoral Training; 2.5 Subsequent Careers; 2.6 Concluding Observations; References; Chapter 3: Doctoral Training inSweden: History, Trends andDevelopments; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Historical Development; 3.3 Descriptive Statistics; 3.3.1 Doctoral Training andSwedish Higher Education Institutions; 3.3.2 Long-Term Statistical Trends.
متن يادداشت
3.4 The Structure ofDoctoral Training3.5 Career Paths forPhDs; 3.6 Conclusion; References; Chapter 4: Cooperation andCompetition inSwiss Doctoral Training: FortheSake oftheKnowledge Society?; 4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Swiss Doctoral Education's Development; 4.2.1 Reshaping theStructure ofUniversities; 4.2.2 Establishing Doctoral Schools andTailor-Made Reform Elements; 4.2.3 Degree ofCooperation andCompetition; 4.3 A Stronger Orientation Towardsthe Knowledge Society's Needs?; 4.4 The Recent Evolution ofExisting Doctoral Training; 4.5 The Development ofNew Forms ofDoctorates.
متن يادداشت
4.6 Doctors ontheSwiss Labour Market4.7 The NextChallenge: Diversifying Doctoral Training While Maintaining theOverall Quality; References; Chapter 5: A Tale ofExpansion andChange: Major Trends inDoctoral Training andintheDoctoral Population inPortugal; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 The Development ofMass Higher Education inPortugal; 5.3 Increasing Emphasis onQuality andPerformance; 5.4 Doctoral Training inPortugal; 5.4.1 Recent Trends; 5.4.2 Exploring theTraining ofDoctorates inPortugal; 5.5 Situation ofDoctorate Holders.
متن يادداشت
5.5.1 Brief Characterization ofDoctorate Holders inPortugal5.5.2 Professional Situation; 5.5.3 Portuguese Doctorates' Professional andPersonal Satisfaction Levels; 5.5.4 Mobility Patterns ofPortuguese Doctorate Holders; 5.6 Looking Ahead: Major Issues andChallenges; References; Part II: Doctoral Education in Anglo-American Systems; Chapter 6: US Doctoral Study toEarly Career; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 Background; 6.2.1 The Golden Age andBeyond; 6.2.2 Changing Rationales forGraduate Education; 6.3 Some Recent Trends; 6.3.1 Differences by Institutional "Rank" andAcademic Field.
بدون عنوان
0
بدون عنوان
8
بدون عنوان
8
بدون عنوان
8
بدون عنوان
8
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
This book explores and compares the systems of doctoral education in twelve higher education systems, consisting of four systems in East Asia, four in Europe and four Anglo-American systems. The emphasis placed on doctoral education and training has increased dramatically in many higher education systems in response to the global competition for highly skilled human resources to serve the needs of knowledge societies. Doctoral education is a key element within the research and development infrastructure, and doctoral students support university research and represent the next generation of the professoriate. While doctoral education has received considerable attention within national higher education systems, there has been surprisingly little international or comparative research on the structure of doctoral education and the nature of contemporary reforms.