• صفحه اصلی
  • جستجوی پیشرفته
  • فهرست کتابخانه ها
  • درباره پایگاه
  • ارتباط با ما
  • تاریخچه

عنوان
How resisting democracies can defeat substate terrorism :

پدید آورنده
Berger, Michael Andrew

موضوع
Terrorism ; Terror ; Counter-terrorism ; Counter-terror ; Coercion ; Strategic coercion ; Counterterrorism ; Strategic studies ; Strategy ; Al Qaeda ; Al Qa'ida ; Substate threat ; Insurgency ; Counter-insurgency ; Coercive diplomacy ; Military coercion ; IRA ; Northern Ireland ; Palestinian Territories ; Israel ; Hamas ; Fatah ; Terrorists ; Insurgents ; War on terror ; Nationalistic terrorist organization ; Deterrence ; Grand strategy ; Popular support ; Policy ; Government policy ; National defense ; Defence ; United Kingdom ; American ; United States ; Democracies ; HV6431.B464 ; Terrorism ; Terrorism--Prevention--Government policy ; Terrorism--Prevention--Government policy--Great Britain ; Terrorism--Prevention--Government policy--Israel ; National security ; Civil defense ; Strategic culture ; Great Britain--Foreign relations--Ireland ; Israel--Foreign relations--Palestine

رده

کتابخانه
مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

محل استقرار
استان: قم ـ شهر: قم

مرکز و کتابخانه مطالعات اسلامی به زبان‌های اروپایی

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

شماره کتابشناسی ملی

شماره
TLets552372

عنوان و نام پديدآور

عنوان اصلي
How resisting democracies can defeat substate terrorism :
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Berger, Michael Andrew
عنوان اصلي به قلم نويسنده ديگر
formulating a theoretical framework for strategic coercion against nationalistic substate terrorist organizations
نام ساير پديدآوران
Lang, Anthony F.; Boyle, Michael

وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
University of St Andrews
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2010

یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها

جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
Thesis (Ph.D.)
امتياز متن
2010

یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده

متن يادداشت
The following dissertation develops a theoretical framework for guiding the strategy of democratic states in successfully countering the hostilities of nationalistic substate terrorist organizations (NSTOs), and effectively manipulating the terrorist group's (and its supporting elements') decision-making calculus. In particular, the theory of strategic coercion has been chosen as a basis for formulating this framework, based upon: 1) the invaluable guidance it offers in dynamically drawing upon all instruments of national power-economic, diplomatic, military, etc.-to accomplish politico-strategic objectives; and 2) the unique insights it provides into making strategic moves aimed at influencing the choices taken by an adversary. However, strategic coercion theory as it currently stands is inadequate for applications against substate terrorist organizations. As a quintessential cornerstone for prescriptive policy in strategic studies, such a looming deficiency vis-à-vis one the most important security threats of the modern age is unacceptable. The new theoretical framework established in this dissertation-entitled the Balance Theory of strategic coercion-addresses this deficiency. The Balance Theory stresses that three key coercive elements of strategic coercion are fundamentally important for successfully ending the hostilities posed by NSTOs, being: A) Isolation of external/international support; B) Denial; and C) Isolation of popular support. It posits that these three aspects of strategic coercion serve as the sine qua non for success in countering an NSTO's campaign of violence and effectively manipulating its decision-making process. Implementation of these three elements, moreover, must be pursued in tandem, taking care so as not to sacrifice one aspect for the other. The Balance Theory is tested through the employment of case-study analysis. In pursuing this end, both cross-case and within-case analyses are performed, accompanied by the utilization of the methods of focused, structured comparison. The cases examined are those of: 1) The United Kingdom versus Republican NSTOs (1969-2007); and 2) Israel versus Palestinian NSTOs (1967-present). The dissertation concludes with an examination of how the Balance Theory may provide insights for the formulation of counter-terrorism strategy against Al Qaeda in the current "War on Terror".

موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)

موضوع مستند نشده
Terrorism ; Terror ; Counter-terrorism ; Counter-terror ; Coercion ; Strategic coercion ; Counterterrorism ; Strategic studies ; Strategy ; Al Qaeda ; Al Qa'ida ; Substate threat ; Insurgency ; Counter-insurgency ; Coercive diplomacy ; Military coercion ; IRA ; Northern Ireland ; Palestinian Territories ; Israel ; Hamas ; Fatah ; Terrorists ; Insurgents ; War on terror ; Nationalistic terrorist organization ; Deterrence ; Grand strategy ; Popular support ; Policy ; Government policy ; National defense ; Defence ; United Kingdom ; American ; United States ; Democracies ; HV6431.B464 ; Terrorism ; Terrorism--Prevention--Government policy ; Terrorism--Prevention--Government policy--Great Britain ; Terrorism--Prevention--Government policy--Israel ; National security ; Civil defense ; Strategic culture ; Great Britain--Foreign relations--Ireland ; Israel--Foreign relations--Palestine

نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Berger, Michael Andrew

نام شخص - ( مسئولیت معنوی درجه دوم )

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Lang, Anthony F.; Boyle, Michael

شناسه افزوده (تنالگان)

مستند نام تنالگان تاييد نشده
University of St Andrews

دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی

نام الکترونيکي
 مطالعه متن کتاب 

وضعیت انتشار

فرمت انتشار
p

اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی

نوع ماده
[Thesis]
کد کاربرگه
276903

اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد

سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y

پیشنهاد / گزارش اشکال

اخطار! اطلاعات را با دقت وارد کنید
ارسال انصراف
این پایگاه با مشارکت موسسه علمی - فرهنگی دارالحدیث و مرکز تحقیقات کامپیوتری علوم اسلامی (نور) اداره می شود
مسئولیت صحت اطلاعات بر عهده کتابخانه ها و حقوق معنوی اطلاعات نیز متعلق به آنها است
برترین جستجوگر - پنجمین جشنواره رسانه های دیجیتال