Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice
نام نخستين پديدآور
edited by Nancy J. Nersessian.
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Dordrecht
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Springer Netherlands
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
1987
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
(XIII, 221 pages)
فروست
عنوان فروست
Science and philosophy, 3.
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
Method in the philosophy of science and epistemology: How to inquire about inquiry and knowledge --; 'Twixt method and madness --; Historical realism and contextual objectivity: A developing perspective in the philosophy of science --; Research problems and the understanding of science --; Twenty years after --; The semantic approach to scientific theories --; The garden in the machine: Gender relations, the processes of science, and feminist epistemological strategies --; The cognitive study of science --; A cognitive --; historical approach to meaning in scientific theories --; Naturalizing observation --; Realist methodology in genetics --; Parsimony and the units of selection.
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
For some time now the philosophy of science has been undergoing a major transfor mation. It began when the 'received view' of scientific knowledge -that developed by logical positivists and their intellectual descendants - was challenged as bearing little resemblance to and having little relevance for the understanding of real science. Subsequently, an overwhelming amount of criticism has been added. One would be hard-pressed to find anyone who would support the 'received view' today. Yet, in the search for a new analysis of scientific knowledge, this view continues to exert influence over the tenor of much of present-day philosophy of science; in particular, over its problems and its methods of analysis. There has, however, emerged an area within the discipline - called by some the 'new philosophy of science' - that has been engaged in transforming the problems and methods of philosophy of science. While there is far from a consensus of beliefs in this area, most of the following contentions would be affirmed by those working in it: - that science is an open-ended, on-going activity, whose character has changed significantly during its history - that science is not a monolithic enterprise - that good science can lead to false theories - that science has its roots in everyday circumstances, needs, methods, concepts, etc.
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Science -- Philosophy.
رده بندی کنگره
شماره رده
Q175
.
3
نشانه اثر
E358
1987
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )