• Home
  • Advanced Search
  • Directory of Libraries
  • About lib.ir
  • Contact Us
  • History
  • ورود / ثبت نام

عنوان
Assessing the African Union Concerns about Article 16 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court

پدید آورنده
Max du Plessis, Charles C. Jalloh, Dapo Akande, et al.

موضوع
African Union (AU),Article 16 Rome Statute,Article 53 Rome Statute,AU concerns about ICC,AU proposal to amend Art. 16,International Criminal Court (ICC),peace versus justice in Sudan,President Omar Al Bashir,Security Council power to defer ICC situations and investigations

رده

کتابخانه
Center and Library of Islamic Studies in European Languages

محل استقرار
استان: Qom ـ شهر: Qom

Center and Library of Islamic Studies in European Languages

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY NUMBER

Number
LA108104

LANGUAGE OF THE ITEM

.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc
انگلیسی

TITLE AND STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY

Title Proper
Assessing the African Union Concerns about Article 16 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
General Material Designation
[Article]
First Statement of Responsibility
Max du Plessis, Charles C. Jalloh, Dapo Akande, et al.

.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC

Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill | Nijhoff

SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT

Text of Note
This article assesses the African Union's (AU) concerns about Article 16 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It seeks to articulate a clearer picture of the law and politics of deferrals within the context of the AU's repeated calls to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC, or the Council) to invoke Article 16 to suspend the processes initiated by the ICC against President Omar Al Bashir of Sudan. The Council's failure to accede to the AU request led African States to formally withhold cooperation from the ICC in respect to the arrest and surrender of the Sudanese leader. Given the AU's continued concerns, and the current impasse, fundamental questions have arisen about the Council's authority to exercise, or not exercise, its deferral power. This culminated into a November 2009 African proposal for an amendment to the Rome Statute to empower the UN General Assembly to act should the UNSC fail to act on a deferral request after six months. Although ICC States Parties have so far shown limited public support for the AU's proposed amendment to the deferral provision, this article examines its merits because a failure to engage the "Article 16 problem" could impact international accountability efforts in the Sudan, and further damage the ICC's credibility in Africa. This unresolved issue also has wider significance given that the matters underlying the tension ‐ how ICC prosecutions may be reconciled with peacemaking initiatives and the role and power of the Council in ICC business ‐ will likely arise in future situations from around the world. This article assesses the African Union's (AU) concerns about Article 16 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC). It seeks to articulate a clearer picture of the law and politics of deferrals within the context of the AU's repeated calls to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC, or the Council) to invoke Article 16 to suspend the processes initiated by the ICC against President Omar Al Bashir of Sudan. The Council's failure to accede to the AU request led African States to formally withhold cooperation from the ICC in respect to the arrest and surrender of the Sudanese leader. Given the AU's continued concerns, and the current impasse, fundamental questions have arisen about the Council's authority to exercise, or not exercise, its deferral power. This culminated into a November 2009 African proposal for an amendment to the Rome Statute to empower the UN General Assembly to act should the UNSC fail to act on a deferral request after six months. Although ICC States Parties have so far shown limited public support for the AU's proposed amendment to the deferral provision, this article examines its merits because a failure to engage the "Article 16 problem" could impact international accountability efforts in the Sudan, and further damage the ICC's credibility in Africa. This unresolved issue also has wider significance given that the matters underlying the tension ‐ how ICC prosecutions may be reconciled with peacemaking initiatives and the role and power of the Council in ICC business ‐ will likely arise in future situations from around the world.

SET

Date of Publication
2011
Physical description
5-50
Title
African Journal of Legal Studies
Volume Number
4/1
International Standard Serial Number
1708-7384

UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS

Subject Term
African Union (AU)
Subject Term
Article 16 Rome Statute
Subject Term
Article 53 Rome Statute
Subject Term
AU concerns about ICC
Subject Term
AU proposal to amend Art. 16
Subject Term
International Criminal Court (ICC)
Subject Term
peace versus justice in Sudan
Subject Term
President Omar Al Bashir
Subject Term
Security Council power to defer ICC situations and investigations

PERSONAL NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY

Charles C. Jalloh
Dapo Akande
Max du Plessis

LOCATION AND CALL NUMBER

Call Number
10.1163/170873811X563947

ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS

Electronic name
 مطالعه متن کتاب 

p

[Article]
275578

a
Y

Proposal/Bug Report

Warning! Enter The Information Carefully
Send Cancel
This website is managed by Dar Al-Hadith Scientific-Cultural Institute and Computer Research Center of Islamic Sciences (also known as Noor)
Libraries are responsible for the validity of information, and the spiritual rights of information are reserved for them
Best Searcher - The 5th Digital Media Festival