• Home
  • Advanced Search
  • Directory of Libraries
  • About lib.ir
  • Contact Us
  • History

عنوان
On the Relationship Between Method and the Object of Study When Studying Religion

پدید آورنده
Cameron David Warner

موضوع
anthropology of religion,cognitive science of religion,history of religions,method,superstition,theory

رده

کتابخانه
Center and Library of Islamic Studies in European Languages

محل استقرار
استان: Qom ـ شهر: Qom

Center and Library of Islamic Studies in European Languages

تماس با کتابخانه : 32910706-025

NATIONAL BIBLIOGRAPHY NUMBER

Number
LA122780

LANGUAGE OF THE ITEM

.Language of Text, Soundtrack etc
انگلیسی

TITLE AND STATEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY

Title Proper
On the Relationship Between Method and the Object of Study When Studying Religion
General Material Designation
[Article]
First Statement of Responsibility
Cameron David Warner

.PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC

Place of Publication, Distribution, etc.
Leiden
Name of Publisher, Distributor, etc.
Brill

SUMMARY OR ABSTRACT

Text of Note
If a discipline is defined by the object of its study, then the definition of the object of study has a priori paramount importance. Studies of the evolution of the study of religion show that researchers have been unable to escape their own socio-political contexts. I begin with a brief consideration of the evolution of superstition as a means to gain perspective on the evolution of the study of religion and definitions of religion and as a cautionary note to both the contextual study of religion and the cognitive-evolutionary (ce) study of religion. I then continue with an overview of our conference, "Researching Religion: Methodological Debates in Anthropology and the Study of Religion," at Aarhus University, and the seven articles published in this special double issue of Numen. Taken together, they reflect and address an international rupture between the contextual and the ce study of religion, and point towards productive avenues for future research. If a discipline is defined by the object of its study, then the definition of the object of study has a priori paramount importance. Studies of the evolution of the study of religion show that researchers have been unable to escape their own socio-political contexts. I begin with a brief consideration of the evolution of superstition as a means to gain perspective on the evolution of the study of religion and definitions of religion and as a cautionary note to both the contextual study of religion and the cognitive-evolutionary (ce) study of religion. I then continue with an overview of our conference, "Researching Religion: Methodological Debates in Anthropology and the Study of Religion," at Aarhus University, and the seven articles published in this special double issue of Numen. Taken together, they reflect and address an international rupture between the contextual and the ce study of religion, and point towards productive avenues for future research.

SET

Date of Publication
2014
Physical description
131-144
Title
Numen
Volume Number
61/2-3
International Standard Serial Number
1568-5276

UNCONTROLLED SUBJECT TERMS

Subject Term
anthropology of religion
Subject Term
cognitive science of religion
Subject Term
history of religions
Subject Term
method
Subject Term
superstition
Subject Term
theory

PERSONAL NAME - PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY

Cameron David Warner

LOCATION AND CALL NUMBER

Call Number
10.1163/15685276-12341312

ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS

Electronic name
 مطالعه متن کتاب 

p

[Article]
275578

a
Y

Proposal/Bug Report

Warning! Enter The Information Carefully
Send Cancel
This website is managed by Dar Al-Hadith Scientific-Cultural Institute and Computer Research Center of Islamic Sciences (also known as Noor)
Libraries are responsible for the validity of information, and the spiritual rights of information are reserved for them
Best Searcher - The 5th Digital Media Festival