عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
شماره کتابشناسی ملی
شماره
TLpq2420559385
زبان اثر
زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن
انگلیسی
عنوان و نام پديدآور
عنوان اصلي
Differences Between Conservative and Liberal Political Judgments
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Chesnut, Jason Dylan
نام ساير پديدآوران
Kimball, Reginald
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Grand Canyon University
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2020
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
296
یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها
جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
Ph.D.
کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده
Grand Canyon University
امتياز متن
2020
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Political ideology influences government policies that impact many areas of life. Ideology also leads to cognitive biases. The purpose of this quantitative experimental study was to determine if and to what extent a group's ingroup/outgroup status and advantage/disadvantage status affect political biases toward those groups. The theoretical framework was provided by the dual-process motivational model and the ideologically objectionable premise model (IOPM). Biases were assessed using a scenario describing a law mandating voluntary prayer space in public schools for students belonging to one of four religious groups. Data were collected from a convenience sample of 886 adult college undergraduates via an online survey. Results of one ANOVA showed significant main effects of right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), ingroup/outgroup status, and relative inequality of advantage on law approval, F(7, 252) = 12.457, p < .001. Follow-up analyses showed a conservative bias in favor of Christian students over Muslims, t(58) = 2.839, p = .006; a liberal bias in favor of Muslims over Christians, t(56) = -4.913, p < .000; no conservative bias in favor of either Jews or Hindus, t(73) = -1.658, p = .102; and a liberal bias in favor of Hindus over Jews, t(65) = -2.552, p = .013. Results of a second ANOVA using social dominance orientation in place of RWA were non-significant, F(7, 317) = 0.896, p = .345. Results suggest that the IOPM was supported while the predicted effects of group advantage/disadvantage were partially supported. These findings have practical significance as they may help to improve political discourse.
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Behavioral psychology
موضوع مستند نشده
Cognitive psychology
موضوع مستند نشده
Political science
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Chesnut, Jason Dylan
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Kimball, Reginald
دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی
نام الکترونيکي
مطالعه متن کتاب وضعیت انتشار
فرمت انتشار
p
اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی
نوع ماده
[Thesis]
کد کاربرگه
276903
اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد
سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y
