عنوان

Democratization or De-Democratization:

شماره

TLpq2387691338

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن

انگلیسی

عنوان اصلي

Democratization or De-Democratization:

نام عام مواد

[Thesis]

نام نخستين پديدآور

Jones, Defne

عنوان اصلي به قلم نويسنده ديگر

The Role of Civil Society in Mass and Elite Interactions

نام ساير پديدآوران

Silay, Kemal

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره

Indiana University

تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره

2019

نام خاص و کميت اثر

430

جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن

Ph.D.

کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده

Indiana University

امتياز متن

2019

متن يادداشت

The purpose of this study is to understand how and why in an environment where democratization was the trend, de-democratization can occur. Beyond the point of transition to democracy, less is known about how and why a country de-democratizes over time. Focusing on agency involved in the de-democratization process, do civil society and political elites play a role in the de-democratization process and if so, how? Scholars usually assume that once a transition is complete and a democracy is consolidated it is impervious to change. Yet, how civil society actors interact with political elites in order to bolster or inhibit democracy should not overemphasize civil society as a purely democratizing force. Simply the presence or growth in the number of civil society groups does not translate to democratization, but rather I argue that it could also signal a downward trend in democracy depending upon context. Furthermore, beyond civil society actors' direct impact on democratization, this study examines how their interactions with political elites affects (de-) democratization. Religious organization consultation by policy-makers is one way to precipitate de-democratization. This study combines in-depth case study analysis of Turkey and Iran through content analysis, extensive fieldwork across four countries, and cross-national statistical analysis. I find at the macro-level that growing numbers and strength of civil society organizations corresponds with de-democratization. The implications of this finding are that civil society cannot be considered a panacea for democratization. Another finding at the meso-level relates to policy-makers consultation of religious civil society organizations correlated with de-democratization. In conjunction with consultation of secular civil society organizations within a de-democratizing phase, deepening de-democratization takes place. The implications of the previous findings show that consulting religious groups is a detriment to democracy and policy-makers need to look elsewhere for advice on policy. Furthermore, policy-makers should not justify consultation of civil society as a solution to efforts in democratization. Finally, the micro-level finding shows that frequent constitutional amendments to protect the executive branch strengthens super-presidentialism. The implications of this should signal extreme caution in voters approving constitutional amendments without assessing the true intentions.

موضوع مستند نشده

International relations

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Jones, Defne

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Silay, Kemal

نام الکترونيکي

فرمت انتشار

p

نوع ماده

[Thesis]

کد کاربرگه

276903

سطح دسترسي

a

تكميل شده

Y