عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
شماره کتابشناسی ملی
شماره
TLets459710
عنوان و نام پديدآور
عنوان اصلي
A critical evaluation of Fiedler's predictor measures of leadership effectiveness
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Hosking, Dian Marie
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
University of Warwick
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
1978
یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها
جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
Ph.D.
کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده
University of Warwick
امتياز متن
1978
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Fiedler has claimed that leadership effectiveness is a function of: a) the type of leader (measured by LPC or ASO), b) the type of group, c) the type of task, and d) the position-power of the leader. In Part I, evidence is presented to show that LPC/ASO scores correlate with leadership effectiveness, but not in the manner required by Fiedler's theory. The conclusions reached differ from those usually presented in the literature, and are based on a detailed, systematic description of available research. It is felt that this critique constitutes a substantial theoretical contribution, worthy of publication in its own right. In Parts II and III, the meaning of LPC/ASO is examined. Particular attention is paid to relationships between LPC/ASO and: a) cognitive complexity; b) perceptions of leader behaviour. Three types of evidence are presented: a) a critical review of existing studies (felt to be a substantial contribution to the literature); b) correlations between LPC/ASO and independent measures of cognitive complexity (calculated for subjects with and without leadership experience); c) an experimental investigation of perceptions of leader behaviour It is concluded that: a) Existing interpretations of LPC/ASO are inadequate. In particular, LPC/ASO do not relate to measures of cognitive complexity used in this study. b) LPC/ASO do not appear to reflect straightforward differences in perceptions of leader behaviour. c) No satisfactory interpretation of LPC/ASO exists, furthermore, recent research calls into question their test-retest reliability. d) Fiedler's theory contains severe theoretical and methodological flaws, and lacks empirical support. It is suggested that his theory be rejected, and further research concentrate on other individual-difference variables.
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
HD Industries. Land use. Labor
موضوع مستند نشده
HM Sociology
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Hosking, Dian Marie
شناسه افزوده (تنالگان)
مستند نام تنالگان تاييد نشده
University of Warwick
دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی
نام الکترونيکي
مطالعه متن کتاب وضعیت انتشار
فرمت انتشار
p
اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی
نوع ماده
[Thesis]
کد کاربرگه
276903
اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد
سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y
