Brent D. Shaw has questioned the historicity of the Neronian persecution based on two arguments from silence: Tacitus's use of the term "Christians" is an anachronism; and Suetonius knows of no connection between the fire in Rome and Nero's police actions against the Christians. Both of these untestable arguments from silence are inherently weak logically. One can make a good case for the claim that Chrestianus, Christianus, and Χριστιανός are not creations of the second century and that Roman officials were probably aware of the Chrestiani in the 60s. Tacitus's and Suetonius's accounts of the persecution are fundamentally reliable. Brent D. Shaw has questioned the historicity of the Neronian persecution based on two arguments from silence: Tacitus's use of the term "Christians" is an anachronism; and Suetonius knows of no connection between the fire in Rome and Nero's police actions against the Christians. Both of these untestable arguments from silence are inherently weak logically. One can make a good case for the claim that Chrestianus, Christianus, and Χριστιανός are not creations of the second century and that Roman officials were probably aware of the Chrestiani in the 60s. Tacitus's and Suetonius's accounts of the persecution are fundamentally reliable.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2020
توصيف ظاهري
237-264
عنوان
Vigiliae Christianae
شماره جلد
74/3
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
1570-0720
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
Chrestiani
اصطلاح موضوعی
Christiani
اصطلاح موضوعی
Neronian persecution
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )