عنوان

Parental Disputes, Religious Upbringing and Welfare in English Law and the ECHR

شماره

LA126090

زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن

انگلیسی

عنوان اصلي

Parental Disputes, Religious Upbringing and Welfare in English Law and the ECHR

نام عام مواد

[Article]

نام نخستين پديدآور

Sylvie Langlaude

محل نشرو پخش و غیره

Leiden

نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره

Brill

متن يادداشت

This article assesses the position of English law concerning parental disputes about the religious upbringing of children. Despite the strong emphasis on both parents being able to direct their child's religious upbringing, courts have interpreted the child's welfare to restrict the exposure of the child to parental religious beliefs or practices in some circumstances: preserving the child's future choice of religion, the physical integrity of the child, the child's contact and relationship with both parents, the child's educational choices, and the child's relationship with both parents' religious community. It is suggested that courts should have a wide understanding of welfare and should be wary to prohibit parents teaching their minority beliefs. This article also compares the position of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and suggests that, despite the stronger emphasis by the ECtHR on parental rights, English law is generally not that much at odds with the ECtHR. This article assesses the position of English law concerning parental disputes about the religious upbringing of children. Despite the strong emphasis on both parents being able to direct their child's religious upbringing, courts have interpreted the child's welfare to restrict the exposure of the child to parental religious beliefs or practices in some circumstances: preserving the child's future choice of religion, the physical integrity of the child, the child's contact and relationship with both parents, the child's educational choices, and the child's relationship with both parents' religious community. It is suggested that courts should have a wide understanding of welfare and should be wary to prohibit parents teaching their minority beliefs. This article also compares the position of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and suggests that, despite the stronger emphasis by the ECtHR on parental rights, English law is generally not that much at odds with the ECtHR.

تاريخ نشر

2014

توصيف ظاهري

1-30

عنوان

Religion & Human Rights

شماره جلد

9/1

شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها

1871-0328

اصطلاح موضوعی

children

اصطلاح موضوعی

circumcision

اصطلاح موضوعی

education

اصطلاح موضوعی

England

اصطلاح موضوعی

European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)

اصطلاح موضوعی

freedom of choice

اصطلاح موضوعی

religion

اصطلاح موضوعی

religious upbringing

مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده

Sylvie Langlaude

شماره بازیابی

10.1163/18710328-12341261

نام الکترونيکي

فرمت انتشار

p

نوع ماده

[Article]

کد کاربرگه

275578

سطح دسترسي

a

تكميل شده

Y