Peasant Revolts as Anti-Authoritarian Archetypes for Radical Buddhism in Modern Japan
نام عام مواد
[Article]
نام نخستين پديدآور
James Mark Shields
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Leiden
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Brill
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
The late Meiji period (1868-1912) witnessed the birth of various forms of "progressive" and "radical" Buddhism both within and beyond traditional Japanese Buddhist institutions. This paper examines several historical precedents for "Buddhist revolution" in East Asian-and particularly Japanese-peasant rebellions of the early modern period. I argue that these rebellions, or at least the received narratives of such, provided significant "root paradigms" for the thought and practice of early Buddhist socialists and radical Buddhists of early twentieth century Japan. Even if these narratives ended in "failure"-as, indeed, they often did-they can be understood as examples of what James White calls "expressionistic action," in which figures act out of interests or on the basis of principle without concern for "success." Although White argues that: "Such expressionistic action was not a significant component of popular contention in Tokugawa Japan"-that does not mean that the received tales were not interpreted in such a fashion by later Meiji, Taishō and Shōwa-era sympathizers. The late Meiji period (1868-1912) witnessed the birth of various forms of "progressive" and "radical" Buddhism both within and beyond traditional Japanese Buddhist institutions. This paper examines several historical precedents for "Buddhist revolution" in East Asian-and particularly Japanese-peasant rebellions of the early modern period. I argue that these rebellions, or at least the received narratives of such, provided significant "root paradigms" for the thought and practice of early Buddhist socialists and radical Buddhists of early twentieth century Japan. Even if these narratives ended in "failure"-as, indeed, they often did-they can be understood as examples of what James White calls "expressionistic action," in which figures act out of interests or on the basis of principle without concern for "success." Although White argues that: "Such expressionistic action was not a significant component of popular contention in Tokugawa Japan"-that does not mean that the received tales were not interpreted in such a fashion by later Meiji, Taishō and Shōwa-era sympathizers.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2016
توصيف ظاهري
3-21
عنوان
Journal of Religion in Japan
شماره جلد
5/1
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
2211-8349
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
Buddhist modernism
اصطلاح موضوعی
peasant rebellion
اصطلاح موضوعی
radical Buddhism
اصطلاح موضوعی
religion and politics
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )