The article examines the elusive nature of ecumenical agreement and the slippery notion of consensus, particularly in dialogue between the Roman Catholic, the Lutheran and the Anglican Churches, not least in the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (1999) between the Roman Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation. In a critical engagement with Minna Hietamäki's Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue (2010), the article draws attention to the general lack of critical reflection on methodology in ecumenical dialogue and encourages a heightened awareness of its pitfalls. The article examines the elusive nature of ecumenical agreement and the slippery notion of consensus, particularly in dialogue between the Roman Catholic, the Lutheran and the Anglican Churches, not least in the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification (1999) between the Roman Catholic Church and the Lutheran World Federation. In a critical engagement with Minna Hietamäki's Agreeable Agreement: An Examination of the Quest for Consensus in Ecumenical Dialogue (2010), the article draws attention to the general lack of critical reflection on methodology in ecumenical dialogue and encourages a heightened awareness of its pitfalls.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
2012
توصيف ظاهري
54-70
عنوان
Ecclesiology
شماره جلد
8/1
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
1745-5316
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
ecumenical agreement
اصطلاح موضوعی
ecumenical consensus
اصطلاح موضوعی
Ecumenical dialogue
اصطلاح موضوعی
Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )