standards and standards policy for the digital economy /
نام نخستين پديدآور
Martin Libicki [and others].
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Santa Monica, CA :
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Rand,
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2000.
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
1 online resource (xxiii, 123 pages) :
ساير جزييات
illustrations
يادداشت کلی
متن يادداشت
"Prepared for the Office of Science and Technology Policy, Science and Technology Policy Institute."
یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
Includes bibliographical references (pages 115-123).
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
Introduction -- The Place of Standards -- Lessons from Five Case Studies -- The Emerging Challenge of Common Semantics -- Standards Development Institutions -- The Place of Standards -- Conclusions -- Appendix A: The Web As We Know It -- Appendix B: The Extensible Markup Language -- Appendix C: Knowledge Organization and Digital Libraries -- Appendix D: Payments, Property, and Privacy -- Appendix E: Standards and the Future Value Chain -- Appendix F: On the Meaning of Standard.
بدون عنوان
0
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Although much of the growing digital economy rests on the Internet and World Wide Web, which in turn rest on information technology standards, it is unclear how much longer the current momentum can be sustained absent new standards. To discover whether today's standards processes are adequate, where they are taking the industry, and whether government intervention will be required to address systemic failures in their development, RAND undertook five case studies. So far, it seems, the current standards process remains basically healthy, with various consortia taking up the reins of the process, and the rise of open-source software has also aided vendor-neutral standardization. Nevertheless, the prospects for semantic standards to fulfill XML's promise are uncertain. Can the federal government help? Its policy on software patents clearly merits revisiting. More proactively, the National Institute for Standards and Technology could intensify its traditional functions: developing metrologies; broadening the technology base; and constructing, on neutral ground, terrain maps of the various electronic-commerce standards and standards contenders.