یادداشتهای مربوط به کتابنامه ، واژه نامه و نمایه های داخل اثر
متن يادداشت
Includes bibliographical references (pages 54-57).
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Regarded as the secondary source advocated by some scholars for this battle around Brunanburh in AD 937, Egil's Saga 'Skalla-Grimssonar' (collated c. AD 1242-3) becomes problematical when compared with literary, historic and archaeological evidence. Thus, this argument places the saga in a rather awkward position. In addressing the general veracity of this saga, allegedly 'written' by Snorri Sturluson in 1240/1 we must draw a comparison to distinguish reality from fiction. For this article highlights not only the questionable traditions of Egil fighting at Brunanburh but whether Snorri's interpretation was motivated by self-interest. More importantly, could other people have gathered together Snorri's notes and produced Egil's Saga? Doubts arise as to its authenticity as many scholars have previously expressed the differing literary anomalies within the narrative. Was the saga written by more than one person? Was it embellished by Snorri or others? Where did the Brunanburh traditions come from? Is it accurate enough to be used as a historic source - a factual reference? The author suggests this approach may identify the incongruities within this saga demonstrating a correct analysis.
نام شخص به منزله موضوع
موضوع مستند نشده
Snorri Sturluson,1179?-1241., Egils saga.
عنوان به منزله موضوع
موضوع مستند نشده
Egils saga (Snorri Sturluson)
موضوع مستند نشده
Egils saga Skallagrímssonar
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Brunanburh, Battle of, 937-- Sources.
موضوع مستند نشده
Schlacht von Brunanburh
رده بندی ديویی
شماره
839
.
63
ويراست
23
رده بندی کنگره
شماره رده
PT7269
.
E4
نشانه اثر
K57
2019
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )