عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
شماره کتابشناسی ملی
شماره
TL49271
زبان اثر
زبان متن نوشتاري يا گفتاري و مانند آن
انگلیسی
عنوان و نام پديدآور
عنوان اصلي
Mutual constructive engagement: A Macintyrean approach to theology of religions-Christianity and Islam in conversation
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
David J. Brewer
نام ساير پديدآوران
Murphy, Nancey C.
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Fuller Theological Seminary, Center for Advanced Theological Study
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2017
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
221
يادداشت کلی
متن يادداشت
Committee members: Early, Christian; Karkkainen, Veli-Matti
یادداشتهای مربوط به نشر، بخش و غیره
متن يادداشت
Place of publication: United States, Ann Arbor; ISBN=978-1-369-63060-2
یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها
جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
Ph.D.
نظم درجات
Center for Advanced Theological Studies
کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده
Fuller Theological Seminary, Center for Advanced Theological Study
امتياز متن
2017
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
In this dissertation I argue that Alasdair MacIntyre's account of tradition-constituted rationality resolves several of the major problems that impede progress for pluralism in theology of religions. Pluralists are motivated by two primary concerns-accounting for the radical diversity of religious belief without negating their intrinsic truth or salvific efficacy, and providing motivation for interreligious dialogue. The first commitment, I contend, undermines the second, for if there is no difference between religious traditions in respect to truth, then there is little to be gained from constructive dialogue at an epistemological level. The first commitment is similarly undermined by the tendency of pluralists to appeal to some form of universal grounding for all religious belief. MacIntyre's account resolves both of these problems. First, by arguing that all rationality is constituted by historically-situated traditions of enquiry, MacIntyre is better able to account for true diversity, arguing that every tradition forms from particular authoritative texts and voices in response to unique historical circumstances, not from universal grounds. Second, by arguing that every tradition is always capable of encountering epistemological crises that call into question the very possibility of knowledge, he not only resolves the problem of relativism, but also preserves true motivation for dialogue, since it is always possible, in the midst of such a crisis, for one tradition to learn from another.
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Religion; Philosophy; Epistemology; Philosophy of Science
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
Philosophy, religion and theology;Divine action;Epistemological crises;Interreligious dialogue;Islam;Rationality;Science and religion
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Chaudhuri, Diviani
نام شخص - ( مسئولیت معنوی درجه دوم )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Murphy, Nancey C.
شناسه افزوده (تنالگان)
تقسيم فرعي
Center for Advanced Theological Studies
مستند نام تنالگان تاييد نشده
Fuller Theological Seminary, Center for Advanced Theological Study
شماره دستیابی
شماره بازیابی
1880538449; 10255288
دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی
نام الکترونيکي
مطالعه متن کتاب وضعیت انتشار
فرمت انتشار
p
اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی
نوع ماده
[Thesis]
کد کاربرگه
276903
اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد
سطح دسترسي
a
تكميل شده
Y
