Muslim-Zoroastrian Relations and Religious Violence in Early Islamic Discourse, 600-1100 C.E.
نام عام مواد
[Thesis]
نام نخستين پديدآور
Andrew David Magnusson
نام ساير پديدآوران
Humphreys, R. Stephen
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
University of California, Santa Barbara
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
2014
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
248
يادداشت کلی
متن يادداشت
Committee members: Campo, Juan E.; Daryaee, Touraj; Gallagher, Nancy
یادداشتهای مربوط به نشر، بخش و غیره
متن يادداشت
Place of publication: United States, Ann Arbor; ISBN=978-1-321-34979-5
یادداشتهای مربوط به پایان نامه ها
جزئيات پايان نامه و نوع درجه آن
Ph.D.
نظم درجات
History
کسي که مدرک را اعطا کرده
University of California, Santa Barbara
امتياز متن
2014
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
This dissertation treats Muslim-Zoroastrian relations between the seventh and eleventh centuries. It challenges the lachrymose narrative of Zoroastrian history, which overemphasizes the role of religious violence in precipitating the decline of Zoroastrianism after the Islamic conquest of Iran. This gloomy narrative is a product of Orientalist tropes, polemical historiographies about the treatment of dhimmis and the effect of the Islamic conquest, the apocalyptic tenor of medieval Zoroastrian sources, and concerns about the status of Zoroastrians in modern Iran and India. Scholars of Zoroastrianism and Iranian languages have written most of the secondary literature on this topic, despite the fact that most of the primary sources were written by Muslims in Arabic. Since few Islamicists have studied Muslim-Zoroastrian relations, the lachrymose narrative persists.
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Religious history; Middle Eastern history; Islamic Studies
اصطلاحهای موضوعی کنترل نشده
اصطلاح موضوعی
Philosophy, religion and theology;Social sciences;Dhimmi;Iran;Islam;Persia;Violence;Zoroastrianism
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )