عنوان
پدید آورنده
موضوع
رده
کتابخانه
محل استقرار
شابک
شابک
9400945701
شابک
9789400945708
شماره کتابشناسی ملی
شماره
b593363
عنوان و نام پديدآور
عنوان اصلي
Doing the Best We Can :
نام عام مواد
[Book]
ساير اطلاعات عنواني
an Essay in Informal Deontic Logic
نام نخستين پديدآور
by Fred Feldman.
وضعیت نشر و پخش و غیره
محل نشرو پخش و غیره
Dordrecht
نام ناشر، پخش کننده و غيره
Springer Netherlands
تاریخ نشرو بخش و غیره
1986
مشخصات ظاهری
نام خاص و کميت اثر
(264 pages)
فروست
عنوان فروست
Philosophical studies series in philosophy, 35.
یادداشتهای مربوط به مندرجات
متن يادداشت
One/Absolute Moral Obligation --; 1. Utilitarian Foundations --; 2. A Theory of Moral Obligation --; 3. Moral Objections to MO --; Two/Iffy Oughts --; 4. Basic Iffy Oughts --; 5 Hypothetical Imperatives --; 6. Defeasible Commitment and Prima Facie Obligation --; Three/Extensions --; 7. Individual Obligation and Group Welfare --; 8. What Ought to be --; 9. Conflicts of Obligation --; 10. Conclusions --; Notes --; Index of Names --; Index of Subjects.
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Several years ago I came across a marvelous little paper in which Hector-Neri Castaneda shows that standard versions of act utilitarian l ism are formally incoherent. I was intrigued by his argument. It had long seemed to me that I had a firm grasp on act utilitarianism. Indeed, it had often seemed to me that it was the clearest and most attractive of normative theories. Yet here was a simple and relatively uncontrover sial argument that showed, with only some trivial assumptions, that the doctrine is virtually unintelligible. The gist of Castaneda's argument is this: suppose we understand act utilitarianism to be the view that an act is obligatory if and only if its utility exceeds that of each alternative. Suppose it is obligatory for a certain person to perform an act with two parts - we can call it 'A & B'. Then, obviously enough, it is also obligatory for this person to perform the parts, A and B. If act utilitarianism were true, we appar ently could infer that the utility of A & B is higher than that of A, and higher than that of B (because A & B is obligatory, and the other acts are alternatives to A & B).
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Ethics.
موضوع مستند نشده
Philosophy (General)
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
by Fred Feldman.
نام شخص - (مسئولیت معنوی برابر )
مستند نام اشخاص تاييد نشده
Fred Feldman
دسترسی و محل الکترونیکی
نام الکترونيکي
مطالعه متن کتاب اطلاعات رکورد کتابشناسی
نوع ماده
[Book]
اطلاعات دسترسی رکورد
تكميل شده
Y
