A feminist argument against statism: public and private in theories of global justice
نام عام مواد
[Article]
نام نخستين پديدآور
/ Angie Pepper
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
Cosmopolitanism and statism represent the two dominant liberal theoretical standpoints in the current debate on global distributive justice. In this paper, I will develop a feminist argument that recommends that statist approaches be rejected. This argument has its roots in the feminist critique of liberal theories of social justice. In Justice, Gender, and the Family Susan Moller Okin argues that many liberal egalitarian theories of justice are inadequate because they assume a strict division between public and private spheres. I will argue that this inadequacy is replicated in statist approaches to global justice. To demonstrate this, I will show how an analogue of Okin's critique of Rawls's A Theory of Justice can be extended to his The Law of Peoples. I will conclude that statist theories inevitably assume a strong divide between public and private spheres and that by doing so they allow for situations marked by gross injustice which anyone concerned with the welfare of the world's most vulnerable should find unacceptable.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
, (April 2014)
توصيف ظاهري
: P. 56-70
عنوان
Journal of Global Ethics
شماره جلد
, 10/1
شماره استاندارد بين المللي پياييندها
9626-1744
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
cosmopolitanism
موضوع مستند نشده
statism
موضوع مستند نشده
feminism
موضوع مستند نشده
global justice
موضوع مستند نشده
Okin
موضوع مستند نشده
Rawls
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )