Do Rawls's theories of justice fit together? A reply to Pogge
نام عام مواد
[Article]
نام نخستين پديدآور
/ Jeffrey Bercuson
يادداشت کلی
متن يادداشت
9626-1744
یادداشتهای مربوط به خلاصه یا چکیده
متن يادداشت
In my reply to Pogge's critique of Rawls's international relations theory, I will try to show two things: (1) that Pogge's account of the public criterion of domestic social justice endorsed by Rawls is a partial one and (2) that this leads him to wrongly postulate a significant asymmetry between Rawls's domestic and international theories of justice. In the end, I hope to show that the domestic and international accounts are characterized by a significant degree of symmetry that both accounts are motivated by Rawls's fundamental concern with selfrespect. In other words, a more expansive, complete account of the domestic public criterion of social justice necessarily leads us (contra Pogge) to affirm a significant degree of continuity between the domestic and international accounts.
مجموعه
تاريخ نشر
, (August–December 2012)
توصيف ظاهري
: P. 251-267
عنوان
Journal of Global Ethics
شماره جلد
, 8/2-3
موضوع (اسم عام یاعبارت اسمی عام)
موضوع مستند نشده
Rawls
موضوع مستند نشده
Pogge
موضوع مستند نشده
global justice
موضوع مستند نشده
self-respect
نام شخص به منزله سر شناسه - (مسئولیت معنوی درجه اول )